Re: shared mailbox permanent flags?

2004-08-19 Thread petite_abeille
On Aug 19, 2004, at 02:45, Larry Osterman wrote: What do you mean it doesn't seem to help between connections? When the same anonymous client connect to the server during a different session, it always sees the messages permanent flags, instead of how it saw them during its previous session.

RE: shared mailbox permanent flags?

2004-08-19 Thread Larry Osterman
Title: RE: shared mailbox permanent flags? Ah, you're right - I forgot about \Recent. \Recent is "special" since it's not a "real" flag. From: Pete Maclean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wed 8/18/2004 2:48 PMTo: Larry Osterman; petite_abeille; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: shared

Re: envelope, bodystructure character set?

2004-08-19 Thread Mark Crispin
What you are doing with RFC 2047 encoding looks correct for the most part. I think that your problem with Mulberry is that (the last I heard) it does not support East Asian characters at all. I said for the most part because you can't use RFC 2047 for the NAME= parameter. You must use RFC

Re: envelope, bodystructure character set?

2004-08-19 Thread petite_abeille
Hi Cyrus, Current versions of Mulberry do not support 2-byte character sets, so that is to be expected. Our next release will add full support for 2-byte charsets. Ok. Another thing that will be nice to fix is that on Mac OS X, Mulberry insists on setting itself as the default email client.

Re: envelope, bodystructure character set?

2004-08-19 Thread petite_abeille
Hi Mark, On Aug 19, 2004, at 19:05, Mark Crispin wrote: I said for the most part because you can't use RFC 2047 for the NAME= parameter. You must use RFC 2231 instead. Ok. Thanks for the clarification. To summarize: (1) Envelope and bodystructure responses are always US-ASCII. Correct? (2)

Re: envelope, bodystructure character set?

2004-08-19 Thread Mark Crispin
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, petite_abeille wrote: (1) Envelope and bodystructure responses are always US-ASCII. Correct? IMAP responses are always ASCII, unless charset tagged in some way. (2) Envelope's env-subject is RFC 2047 encoded if necessary. Correct? (3) Envelope's addr-name is RFC 2047 encoded

Re: envelope, bodystructure character set?

2004-08-19 Thread petite_abeille
On Aug 19, 2004, at 20:44, Mark Crispin wrote: IMAP responses are always ASCII, unless charset tagged in some way. Ok. Is it possible to tag a charset for envelope and bodystructure responses? PA.

Re: envelope, bodystructure character set?

2004-08-19 Thread Mark Crispin
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, petite_abeille wrote: IMAP responses are always ASCII, unless charset tagged in some way. Ok. Is it possible to tag a charset for envelope and bodystructure responses? That's what RFC 2047, etc. do. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from

RE: shared mailbox permanent flags?

2004-08-19 Thread Pete Maclean
Thanks, Larry. I too forgot about the specialness of \Recent when I wrote that message. My misunderstanding about the other flags is a different matter though. For the entire four or so years that I have been working with IMAP up until yesterday I was confidently convinced that a server was not

RE: shared mailbox permanent flags?

2004-08-19 Thread Larry Osterman
The simplest way of doing this is to turn the system flags into bit fields and add a 6 or so bits per message to your per-session in-memory list of messages (you do have an in-memory list of messages, right?) Then as the user does store and fetch of the flags, you just flip the bits on and