Re: SHOULD, \Marked, \Noselect

2003-09-17 Thread ned
I agree. I've updated ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/mail/rfc3501-errata to note this. Mark, you should also consider submitting these to the RFC Editor to be posted on their errata page: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html Ned

Re: Unicode newsgroup name options

2003-02-21 Thread ned
. Ned

Re: draft 20 is available

2002-10-09 Thread ned
. This is especially true for complex docs. Ned P.S. If you've used nroff to produce your internet-draft it sometimes helps the RFC editor to give them your nroff sources after the document approval is announced.

Re: URGENT: draft 17 with IESG-requested changes -- please review!!!!

2002-06-04 Thread ned
. Ned

Re: IESG review of draft-crispin-imapv-16.txt

2002-05-31 Thread ned
is appropriate is up to the group. Ned