On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, David Truckenmiller wrote:
R2: * LIST () / /m/aaa
R2: * LIST () / /m/aaa/one
This. It has been discussed before; see the archives for details.
Andy :-)
--
Andreas Aardal Hanssen
http://www.andreas.hanssen.name/gpg2
Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, David Truckenmiller wrote:
R2: * LIST () / /m/aaa
R2: * LIST () / /m/aaa/one
This. It has been discussed before; see the archives for details.
The mailbox /m/aaa doesn't match mailbox pattern /m/aaa/%, so it
shouldn't be returned.
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
The mailbox /m/aaa doesn't match mailbox pattern /m/aaa/%, so it
shouldn't be returned.
However, hierarchial name /m/aaa/ would match and could be returned as
a \NoSelect name.
If this is a MUST requirement,
Ken Murchison wrote:
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
The mailbox /m/aaa doesn't match mailbox pattern /m/aaa/%, so
it shouldn't be returned.
However, hierarchial name /m/aaa/ would match and could be returned
as a \NoSelect name.
If this is
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
2.1.14 is fairly ancient and I don't have a setup that I can test on to
verify. Here is what the current code does:
. LIST INBOX.cyrus*
* LIST (\HasChildren) . INBOX.cyrus
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX.cyrus.devel
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) .
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Mark Crispin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
The mailbox /m/aaa doesn't match mailbox pattern /m/aaa/%, so
it shouldn't be returned.
However, hierarchial name /m/aaa/ would match and could be returned
as a
Philip Guenther wrote:
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
2.1.14 is fairly ancient and I don't have a setup that I can test on to
verify. Here is what the current code does:
. LIST INBOX.cyrus*
* LIST (\HasChildren) . INBOX.cyrus
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) . INBOX.cyrus.devel
* LIST