[IMGate] antivirus engines

2005-09-05 Thread William Van Hefner
= budget. Thanks. William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[IMGate] Re: IMGate/Postfix under Ubuntu/Debian

2005-09-08 Thread William Van Hefner
install Linux by myself. I wish that I'd listened to Len = and set up an IMGate box years ago. Hope this helps. P.S. Don't forget to back up your original config files. The upgrade = should go smoothly, but you never know. William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc

[IMGate] Re: IMGate/Postfix under Ubuntu/Debian

2005-09-09 Thread William Van Hefner
XP, a single 20GB IDE drive, 1GB = of PC133 RAM and Len's scripts, along with my own set of limited rules and domain blacklist, which alone is blocking more traffic than all of the = RBLs combined. William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc. -Original Message

[IMGate] pub.mxrate.net

2005-09-12 Thread William Van Hefner
with Postfix, but they give no specific instructions on how to get it to work. When I tried simply using pub.mxrate.net it wound-up bouncing mail from known good servers. William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc.

[IMGate] Re: Spamware?

2005-09-27 Thread William Van Hefner
) 79 RBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org 318 SMTP Exceeded Hard Error Limit after RCPT 349 SMTP Exceeded Hard Error Limit after DATA 529 ACL RAV: undeliverable recipient address 946 Other 2614 TOTAL William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL

[IMGate] Spam Weasels Bypassing IMGate

2005-10-10 Thread William Van Hefner
traffic coming for IP addresses besides IMGate, but all of my users are still using mail.thedigest.com for outbound SMTP, and doing that would = keep my users from sending outbound mail through IMail, right? Any clues as = to how I can close this security loophole? Thanks! William Van Hefner Network

[IMGate] Re: hotmail being blocked

2005-10-17 Thread William Van Hefner
Omar, SORBS has never been one of those blacklists that I would trust to = outright reject messages. It is probably better used in a weighted system like Spamassassin, Declude, etc. The simple fact is, those servers ARE being = used to send spam. So, it isn't like SORBS is reporting bogus

[IMGate] Re: reject messages that return 127.0.0.4 code dnsbl.njabl.org

2005-11-04 Thread William Van Hefner
, reject_rhsbl_client rhsbl.ahbl.org, reject_rbl_client all.rbl.kropka.net, reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.ahbl.org, reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcannibal.com, reject_rbl_client pub.mxrate.net=127.0.0.2, William Van Hefner

[IMGate] An e-mail To: x

2005-11-27 Thread William Van Hefner
of these messages, but not all of them. I don't know enough REGEXP to write a rule that would simply filter on x (and nothing else) in the To: field. Would the shortness of such a rule even make it safe, assuming it was possible to write? Thanks much! William Van Hefner Network Administrator

[IMGate] Re: How do I whitelist this helo? (Zaep Key: 8c65c8b8.438f79b5.0c420be7)

2005-12-01 Thread William Van Hefner
E-MAIL GENERATED BY SOFTWARE = THAT SENDS TO FORGED ADDRESSES (Blowback) /Zaep Antispam/ REJECT ACL 420 SEND ALL COMPLAINTS TO ZAEP.COM ADMIN William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED