On Mon, Mar 05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running cyrus 2.0.12 on Linux 2.2.16 (SuSE 7.0) with sasl 1.5.24
I authenticate with pam to /etc/shadow.
After booting the system it is not possible to connect via IMAP.
I restart the master with the scripts used during booting and after
lex -t -Paddr ./addr-lex.l addr-lex.c
lex: illegal option -- P
Usage: lex [-ewctvnVY] [-Q(y/n)] [file]
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `addr-lex.c'
Current working directory /dotcomdot/cyrus-imapd-1.6.24/sieve
OS: Solaris 7
gcc: 2.95.2
TCL: 8.2.1
DB: 3.2.9
Hello,
I get the error "IOERROR: mapping index file for user.XXX: Not enough space"
when a client selects a mailbox. I've traced the process and it seems to be
a HPUX mmap problem when the imapd mmap's twice the index file of the
mailbox. How can I fix or workaround this problem
We are currently testing Cyrus 2.0.12. When delivering mail at a fairly high
rate (1 msg/sec, each with 17 recipients, all recipients beginning with "m")
we see the following message in the imapd log every few seconds:
Mar 9 12:14:15 upsilon lmtpd[11838]: duplicate_mark: closing
Yes it is down temporarily.. My @Home network is having it's occasional
hiccup!! Hopefully will be backup today..
Alain Turbide
- Original Message -
From: "Prune" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Derrick J Brashear" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 5:16 PM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lex -t -Paddr ./addr-lex.l addr-lex.c
lex: illegal option -- P
Usage: lex [-ewctvnVY] [-Q(y/n)] [file]
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `addr-lex.c'
Current working directory /dotcomdot/cyrus-imapd-1.6.24/sieve
The Sieve
HI
I am using cyrus 2.0.11 - Berkeley DB 3.2
Cyrus core dumps in several ways, here is the simplist.
Shutdown calls exit() in imapd.c as a result of processing
a LOGOUT imap4 command.
Any help would be appreciated.
Roger Massey
[Current thread is 1 (process 8651)]
(gdb) bt
#0 0x40009f00 in
Is this possible? Would I have to configure xinetd with --with-libwrap so
the lmtp can use tcp_wrappers?
Thanks,
--Kevin