Net5

2001-11-08 Thread Net5½u¤W¯«ºâ
Title: Net5½u¤W¯«ºâ ³¯´_«ä¡@³Õ¤h ±MÃD ¡@¡@¡@¡D©Ê®æ»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡DÁn­µ»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D±¡ºA»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D®e»ª»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D®ð¦â»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D²´¯«»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y

Re: RFC: Second attempt at sieving for public folders

2001-11-08 Thread Amos Gouaux
On 08 Nov 2001 18:22:35 +, Ian Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ic) writes: ic 8. Summary ic I think this is a good solution because: ic - No new concepts are introduced, it is rather a clarification of ic existing ones ic - Backwards compatibility is preserved ic - You get some nice cool

Re: No NFS? Ok, how about GFS/GPFS

2001-11-08 Thread Amos Gouaux
On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 16:20:18 -0800, Neil Bortnak [EMAIL PROTECTED] (nb) writes: nb I'm not planning on implementing this but could you run a single tier nb cluster of IMAP servers which share the same read-write storage on a SAN nb using GFS or GPFS as a shared filesystem? Can this fix the

Net5

2001-11-08 Thread Net5½u¤W¯«ºâ
Title: Net5½u¤W¯«ºâ ³¯´_«ä¡@³Õ¤h ±MÃD ¡@¡@¡@¡D©Ê®æ»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡DÁn­µ»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D±¡ºA»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D®e»ª»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D®ð¦â»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y ¡@¡@¡@¡D²´¯«»P©R¹BªºÃö«Y

Re: RFC: Sieving mail delivered directly to shared/public folders

2001-11-08 Thread Ian Castle
On Thu, 2001-11-08 at 06:44, Ian Castle wrote: And I have a question - why is the existing name space magic cluttered up with the hash on the user name? Not saying it is unneeded - but if it is needed, then why isn't a similar hash needed in the folder directory? Sorry, I was being

RFC: Second attempt at sieving for public folders

2001-11-08 Thread Ian Castle
This follows on from my previous email, where I presented a method of enabling sieving on mail delivered directly to shared/public folders. While that does all the I need it to do, my implementation only allowed a single active script for all public folders. This is a serious limitation if you

upgrade help

2001-11-08 Thread Kiarna Boyd
Hey guys! I am still tuning my server Solaris 2.7 Sendmail 8 cyrus 2.0.16 Looks like I just need bigger server. I changed the config to look locally for .forwards rather than $Home/.forward. My cpu is still at 100% use. I am seeing 70% user 21% kernel 0.0% io 0.0% swap

RE: upgrade help

2001-11-08 Thread OCNS Consulting
K, Have you considered switching to an Intel Platform running Linux? Try - - Dual 2Ghz P4 - 1 Gig Memory - Raid 0+1 (Disk space depends upon user base needs) - 1000bT NIC You should be able to support 10k - 15k mailboxes; probably more. If you receive any

virus scanner for cyrus

2001-11-08 Thread cyrus-mailinglist
hello folks! i have one question! i need a mailvirusscanner for cyrus server does some know one? thanks in advance oliver kaufmann

virus scanner for cyrus

2001-11-08 Thread cyrus-mailinglist
hello folks! i have one question! i need a mailvirusscanner for cyrus server does some know one? thanks in advance oliver kaufmann

RE: virus scanner for cyrus

2001-11-08 Thread OCNS Consulting
TryAMaViS - A Mail Virus Scanner at - www.amavis.org. RB -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of cyrus-mailinglistSent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: virus scanner for cyrus hello folks!

Sizing help

2001-11-08 Thread Neil Bortnak
Hi all, I've been looking around for specific sizing guidelines but haven't had a lot of luck. I've seen a number of resources that will tell you everything about their system but nothing about their user base (size, e-mail traffic, simultaneous sessions etc). The reverse is also true (here are

No NFS? Ok, how about GFS/GPFS

2001-11-08 Thread Neil Bortnak
Hi all, I'm not planning on implementing this but could you run a single tier cluster of IMAP servers which share the same read-write storage on a SAN using GFS or GPFS as a shared filesystem? Can this fix the problems that one would have with NFS (locking and network load)? That way all the

Re: RFC: Sieving mail delivered directly to shared/public folders

2001-11-08 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
From: Ian Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 08 Nov 2001 06:44:20 + On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 22:22, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: The other thing to consider is how to keep the Cyrus black-box approach. Non-administrators should be able to modify these Sieve scripts and name them