Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, --On Freitag, 10. September 2004 16:27 Uhr +0200 Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right, works fine for us for the most part. Hasn't always been like that, but the most recent kernel updates by Red Hat have improved matters a lot. What did the kernel improve? memory management for the

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Paul Dekkers
Hi, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: You are not using a clustered filesystem, right? No. I can imagine that would be one of the advantages of RH's clustering, since you don't have to mount a filesystem in that case for a machine that just crashed - it would safe time... But I suppose RH's cluster

Re: Automatically expire messages in imap folder

2004-09-15 Thread Christiano Anderson
Patrick Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: su - cyrus -c '/usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/ipurge -f -d 10 user.testuser.Trash How can I do the same with virtual domains? I tried ipurge -f -d 10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] It didn't work. Any suggestion? Thanks --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread David Carter
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Paul Dekkers wrote: On the other hand, if there is a application level redundancy on its way, it doesn't really matter on what platform the machine runs, so it would still make me happier and even with FreeBSD. And I would rather put my money there. Even if it means we'll

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Paul Dekkers
David Carter wrote: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Paul Dekkers wrote: On the other hand, if there is a application level redundancy on its way, it doesn't really matter on what platform the machine runs, so it would still make me happier and even with FreeBSD. And I would rather put my money there. Even

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Jure Pear
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:38:43 +0200 Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I suppose RH's cluster manager takes care of mounting the partitions and checking them if there are any errors. Not really, at least not by itself. See http://people.redhat.com/jrfuller/cms/ for detailed

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, --On Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 13:38 Uhr +0200 Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are not using a clustered filesystem, right? No. I can imagine that would be one of the advantages of RH's clustering, since you don't have to mount a filesystem in that case for a machine that just

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Simon Matter
Hi, --On Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 13:38 Uhr +0200 Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are not using a clustered filesystem, right? No. I can imagine that would be one of the advantages of RH's clustering, since you don't have to mount a filesystem in that case for a machine

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Ken Murchison
Paul Dekkers wrote: David Carter wrote: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Paul Dekkers wrote: On the other hand, if there is a application level redundancy on its way, it doesn't really matter on what platform the machine runs, so it would still make me happier and even with FreeBSD. And I would rather put

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread David Lang
also take a look at the heartbeat package at linux-ha.org This works on linux, *BSD, and solaris (there were people working on a AIX port, but they apparently dropped it shortly before finishing) David Lang On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Jure [UTF-8] PeÄ~Mar wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:07:20

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread David Lang
how much are you asking for? David Lang On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:44:45 -0400 From: Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform -

Problem restoring cyrus environment on backup machine

2004-09-15 Thread Nathan Wiebe
Hi, I've setup a Cyrus server (Invoca rpms 2.2.3) on RHEL 3. I'm backing up all our email, and testing the restore on a second machine. I'm having trouble authenticating users on the backup machine using sasl_pwcheck_method:auxprop (/etc/sasldb2). When I try to authenticate agaist the imap

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Simon Matter
Paul Dekkers wrote: David Carter wrote: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Paul Dekkers wrote: On the other hand, if there is a application level redundancy on its way, it doesn't really matter on what platform the machine runs, so it would still make me happier and even with FreeBSD. And I would

Re: Problem restoring cyrus environment on backup machine

2004-09-15 Thread Andreas Winkelmann
Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 18:43 schrieb Nathan Wiebe: Hi, I've setup a Cyrus server (Invoca rpms 2.2.3) on RHEL 3. I'm backing up all our email, and testing the restore on a second machine. I'm having trouble authenticating users on the backup machine using

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Ken Murchison
Simon Matter wrote: Hi, --On Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 13:38 Uhr +0200 Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are not using a clustered filesystem, right? No. I can imagine that would be one of the advantages of RH's clustering, since you don't have to mount a filesystem in that case for a

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Ken Murchison
David Lang wrote: how much are you asking for? Since this is probably as complex, if not more, as altnamespace, I'd say somewhere between $3000-$5000 as an initial estimate. That's 30-50 hours at a fairly cheap rate. If people want to start pledging their support, perhaps enough incentive can

IOERROR Cannot create anymore mailboxes

2004-09-15 Thread Boyle, Bernadette
Hello, I have a terrible problem at the moment at the university with new students not being able to receive mail because I cannot create any more accounts. I am currently running cyrus-imapd-2.0.17. However I cannot create any more mailboxes. I receive the following error when trying

Re: Problem restoring cyrus environment on backup machine

2004-09-15 Thread Nathan Wiebe
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 12:52, you wrote: Am Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 18:43 schrieb Nathan Wiebe: Hi, I've setup a Cyrus server (Invoca rpms 2.2.3) on RHEL 3. I'm backing up all our email, and testing the restore on a second machine. I'm having trouble authenticating users

Re: IOERROR Cannot create anymore mailboxes

2004-09-15 Thread David Carter
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Boyle, Bernadette wrote: I have a terrible problem at the moment at the university with new students not being able to receive mail because I cannot create any more accounts. What operating system/filesystem? I currently have 32,765 directories in this account and it seems

Re: IOERROR Cannot create anymore mailboxes

2004-09-15 Thread Ken Murchison
Boyle, Bernadette wrote: Hello, I have a terrible problem at the moment at the university with new students not being able to receive mail because I cannot create any more accounts. I am currently running cyrus-imapd-2.0.17. However I cannot create any more mailboxes. I receive the

Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform - need better availability?

2004-09-15 Thread Gary Mills
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:07:08PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: David Lang wrote: how much are you asking for? Since this is probably as complex, if not more, as altnamespace, I'd say somewhere between $3000-$5000 as an initial estimate. That's 30-50 hours at a fairly cheap rate. If

Re: IOERROR Cannot create anymore mailboxes

2004-09-15 Thread Gary Mills
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:41:56PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: Boyle, Bernadette wrote: I receive the following error when trying to create new accounts ... Sep 15 19:05:16 sparrow imapd[7843]: [ID 721126 local6.error] IOERROR: creating directory /var/spool/cyrus1/user/jsnadd11: Too

Re: cyrus imap to alias against ldap

2004-09-15 Thread Igor Brezac
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Base David wrote: Hi All, I have an LDAP directory where, say, attribute sAMAccountName has a value of and attribute objectGUID has a value of . I've got solaris 9, sendmail 8.12.10, cyrus imap 2.2.6, cyrusv2 using lmtp successfully delivering mail addressed to

header folding bug in lmtpd?

2004-09-15 Thread Jason Alderfer
Hi all, I've discovered what appears to be a bug in the header folding code of lmtpd. Cyrus-2.2.8 on Slackware Linux 9.1, 2.4 kernel. It occurs only under the following specific conditions: 1. connections to lmtpd via TCP from a different server 2. remote server connects using TLS 3. remote

Creating Duplicate mail box.

2004-09-15 Thread Software Groups
Hi all, I am using cyrus IMAP for my mail server with auto create folder option. For some mailbox it automatically creates two mailboxes one with upper case and one with lower case letter. For testuser mailbox. I have t/user/testuser t/user/TESTUSER 1. How will I force incoming mails to

Re: Creating Duplicate mail box.

2004-09-15 Thread Simon Matter
Hi all, I am using cyrus IMAP for my mail server with auto create folder option. For some mailbox it automatically creates two mailboxes one with upper case and one with lower case letter. For testuser mailbox. I have t/user/testuser t/user/TESTUSER 1. How will I force incoming mails

Re: header folding bug in lmtpd?

2004-09-15 Thread Christian Stuellenberg
Jason Alderfer sagte: I've discovered what appears to be a bug in the header folding code of lmtpd. Cyrus-2.2.8 on Slackware Linux 9.1, 2.4 kernel. It occurs only under the following specific conditions: 1. connections to lmtpd via TCP from a different server 2. remote server connects