Simon Matter wrote:
A quick tip: if it's only hanging with deliver.db, one could simply wipe
it and start with a new one. It's not really that important, isn't it?
No it isn't really. You will only loose your vacation databases, and if
you are running singleinstance store you would get a
Marcelo Terres wrote:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when the message come
David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Hi,
If you have a dump of the mailbox's (ctl_mboxlist) then you can restore
those, personally I back those up weekly as well as /var/spool/imap
I don't think I have that.
If you don't,
Hi there!
Thanks
deliver.db:
/var/lib/imap/deliver.db: Berkeley DB (Btree, version 9, native byte-order)
The running version is:
2.3.8-3 for FC6
here is our cyrus.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vi /etc/cyrus.conf
# standard standalone server implementation
START {
# do not delete this
Hi there!
Thanks
deliver.db:
/var/lib/imap/deliver.db: Berkeley DB (Btree, version 9, native
byte-order)
The running version is:
2.3.8-3 for FC6
here is our cyrus.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vi /etc/cyrus.conf
# standard standalone server implementation
START {
# do not
Dear All,
I have strange sieveshell error after upgrading to cyrus imapd
2.3.9:
I no longer can use sieveshell to upgrade the sieve rules. I got the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sieveshell mail.domain.hu:2000
connecting to mail.domain.hu:2000
unable to connect to server at
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Dear All,
I have strange sieveshell error after upgrading to cyrus imapd
2.3.9:
I no longer can use sieveshell to upgrade the sieve rules. I got the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sieveshell mail.domain.hu:2000
connecting to
Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Dear All,
I have strange sieveshell error after upgrading to cyrus imapd
2.3.9:
I no longer can use sieveshell to upgrade the sieve rules. I got the
following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sieveshell mail.domain.hu:2000
connecting to mail.domain.hu:2000
unable
Hi,
Quoting Martin Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
I have sieve script which sorts some mails in different folders but I
get now the e-mails twice. One of the copy is going in the responsable
subfolder and the other copy is going in the INBOX. What is going
wrong here?
Here my script:
You should replace all if except first one with elsif,
or remove last else block.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:10:47 +0900, Martin Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I have sieve script which sorts some mails in different folders but I
get now the e-mails twice. One of the copy is going in
Does the script have an :address parameter? If not, it will never work!
Search the list achive; this has been the problem with 3/4 of all cases.
Regards,
Torsten
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
Hello Marcelo
Is the script activated? Is the synatax correct? Check with sieveshell.
Regards,
Yes, the directory is correct. If I put a forward filter there, the
message is forwarded correctly.
The problem is specifically with vacation.
This is the script:
# Sieve Filter
# Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/ingo/) (September 25, 2007, 4:38 pm)
require vacation;
# Férias
vacation
Here is the script:
# Sieve Filter
# Generated by Ingo (http://www.horde.org/ingo/) (September 25, 2007, 4:38 pm)
require vacation;
# Férias
vacation :days 0 :addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] :subject Retorno
de mensagem Teste de mensagem de resposta;
I just don't understand what is require
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Marcelo Terres might have said:
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
I've been trying to get vacation working also. Is the :addresses [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
the address of the person we're looking to send a custom reply to or is this
the
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
On 9/26/07, Torsten Schlabach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the script have an :address parameter? If not, it will never work!
Search the list achive; this has been the problem with 3/4 of all cases.
Regards,
Torsten
I just don't understand what is require vacation.
It's a kind of declaration. Your script announces it will need the
vacation module. If it would not be there, imapd would probably
complain. But it's usually built in.
I'm sure that sieve is working cause if the user add a forward filter,
Hi
- Quote ---
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-07.txt
4.5. Address Parameter and Limiting Replies to Personal Messages
Vacation MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
email address is in a To, Cc, Bcc,
I think that addresses in this case is ':addresses
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I'm putting my address in this line.
On 9/26/07, Mike Eggleston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Marcelo Terres might have said:
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
In this case, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just an example, this is not
the real address.
On 9/26/07, Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcelo Terres wrote:
Yes, the directory is correct. If I put a forward filter there, the
message is forwarded correctly.
The problem is specifically with
Hello.
I hope you made sure that the forwarding is by the means of Sieve, not
in the MTA?
Yes, sieve is working in forward filter. I saw in the logs.
I am not sure about the days: 0 parameter. I know the default is 7, but
will 0 mean that a response is sent every time?
I think so.
I have sieve working (except vacation) for me and I'm trying to
test the filtering rules (not vacation) on another user. It appears
that sieve is not working for that other user. Is there something
I've forgotten to turn on? Must I turn on sieve for each user?
Fedora Core 5
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Hi,
If you have a dump of the mailbox's (ctl_mboxlist) then you can restore
those, personally I back those up weekly as well as /var/spool/imap
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Mike Eggleston might have said:
I have sieve working (except vacation) for me and I'm trying to
test the filtering rules (not vacation) on another user. It appears
that sieve is not working for that other user. Is there something
I've forgotten to turn on? Must I turn on
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:46:08AM -0500, Chris Harms wrote:
Hello,
We will be migrating our cyrus server from x86 to x86_64 for an interim
period and then likely returning to x86 after some time. We will be
upgrading from 2.2.x to 2.3.x as well, and I am wondering if there is a
way to
24 matches
Mail list logo
