(imapd)
43932 cyrus 1 102 0 161M 23416K CPU5 5 1:41 96.17% imapd: imap: hostname> [] user.. Append (imapd)
81590 cyrus 1 102 0 163M 24976K CPU6 6 3:14 94.76% imapd: imap: hostname> [] user.. Append (imapd)
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
Network Operations Center
b...@p
for the webmail. The
webmail (Sogo) can do TLS or SSL, but normally I don't do that for
localhost.
I am using Cyrus 2.4.16 from Debian 7 (Wheezy).
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
b...@pitt.edu
412-624-6470
Cyrus Home Page: http
Can you tell us more about your storage configuration?
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
b...@pitt.edu
412-624-6470
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu
-list.html
telnet to port 119?
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
b...@pitt.edu
412-624-6470
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
I already found this. The quota that is passed to verify_user() by
process_recipient() has to be a quota_t, not an int. A patch was
already submitted.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Ben Carter wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Ben Carter wrote:
You have to do the _exact_ same thing with imapsync, unless you want
to lose email.
As has already been pointed out, you are incorrect. The order is:
[Pre-create inboxes with large quotas on new server]
1
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Ben Carter wrote:
If you use rsync, you have to stop everything until that finishes,
possibly reconstruct all mailboxes, maybe fix some other things before
giving people their mail functionality back and allowing mail delivery
to resume.
That's just silly
/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
Yes, the proxy login worked for us. If by access rights you mean
IMAP ACLs, the imapsync option for this is --syncacls.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
b
, ~65,000 users in ~28 hours by using up to 128
concurrent imapsync processes at a time this way.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
b...@pitt.edu
412-624-6470
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http
, take a look at fssnap (1m). No need to stop
anything and you'll get an exact atomic point in time copy of the
filesystem. If you're using VxFS, look at Snapshot Filesystems - same
thing essentially.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
412-624-6470
---
Cyrus Home
should always be required (which our code does).
When we get a chance, we're going to talk to Derrick about getting some
cluster support into the std. code.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
412-624-6470
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ
node. You could
make these filenames unique across the cluster with code changes if you
want to make the code changes for these also.
We added a clusternode parameter to imapd.conf to accomplish this for
the LMTP stage./ files.
Otherwise, it just worked.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University
QFS. In my benchmarks it was a lot slower than
Veritas' CFS.
Ben
--
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
412-624-6470
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing
in size? Our test mailboxes file is only 72 bytes...
Thanks,
Ben
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
412-624-6470
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Ben Carter wrote:
First of all we have duplicate delivery suppression turned off.
However, deliver.db still seems to be maintained. I saw a post about
it being needed for sieve too but we don't plan to use sieve either. My
question is, can I
to troubleshoot
and operate and a much stronger configuration in terms of availability?
TIA for all input.
Ben Carter
University of Pittsburgh/CSSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
412-624-6470
--On Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:43 PM -0400 Rob Siemborski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:r
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ben Carter wrote:
and an MTA on each cluster member, because with the murder
configuration, you probably have to end up with a load-balancing switch
in front of murder front-end machines
17 matches
Mail list logo