Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Hello. Is it possible to get client authenticated STARTTLS working
with Cyrus IMAPD, without a password login?
I'm assuming EXTERNAL would be used for this, so here is what I put in
imapd.conf
=Stockholm/L=:Stockholm/O=YXA/OU=Simon Josefsson/CN=jas/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
May 27 10:35:46 yxa-iv cyrus/imapd[26577]: starttls: TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA
(128/128 bits new) authenticated as jas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/gnutls-cli -s -p 143 yxa.extundo.com --x509cafile
cacert.pem --x509keyfile
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Nels Lindquist wrote:
On 3 Dec 2002 at 9:57, Steve Wright wrote:
The message below is forwarded from bugtraq.
I've not seen any discussion of this, is an official fix available ?
The semi-exploit shown does indeed segfault
syslog:
May 9 20:48:45 yxa imapd[7371]: open: user jas opened INBOX.msec
May 9 20:48:45 yxa master[13500]: process 7371 exited, signaled to death by 11
imap protocol dump:
1209 SELECT INBOX.msec
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged
I hacked together a KIOslave to access Sieve servers from KDE.
Screenshots and more information at:
http://josefsson.org/kio_sieve/
It only barely works, but should be easy to improve from here.
Note: It doesn't parse the sieve script, just manages them remotely.
Simon Matter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Received: from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21])
by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D4BA757306; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:32:25 +0100 (CET)
...
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering why all copies from Simon Matter on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We also built HA for each mailstore, such that it are in fact two
systems clustered by the kimberlite software mounting a shared
RAID in a failover situation. See
http://oss.missioncriticallinux.com/projects/kimberlite/
for details.
Did you considered more
Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm pleased to announce Cyrus IMAP 2.1.0.
I guess this is CVS tag cyrus-release-2-1-0, but where does
development for future 2.1 versions take place? HEAD?
This was a interesting thread, and I was happy to see that at least
one suggestion, Jawmail, supported WAP, but it caused my stock RedHat
7.1 Apache/PHP build to crash when I ran install.php... So, are
there any other IMAP interfaces with WML support? Any experiences?
It is cheaper to buy another PC than to buy another CPU and add the
CPU to your existing PC, so I would like to have two Cyrus IMAPD
servers that mirror each other. Is this possible? Is the Cyrus
murder related to this? From what I remember, it was only a
front-end to multiple but separate
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, you'd also have to sync /var/imap so you'd keep the mailbox db,
seen state, subscriptions and quotas in sync. You'd probably have to
quiesce Cyrus so that no mail gets delivered, read, moved, etc.
You could use rsync to do the replication or I
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any
secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This
will require resetting all of the users passwords because they can not
be extracted from the old sasldb (unless
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect you're right, William. AFAICT this goes against the RFC however,
since you should only get regex when you use the :regex comparator.
Ken--is this a bug... a feature... a misdiagnosis...?
It appears to be a bug caused by using fnmatch(3)
Try URL:http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3028.txt. Another good resource
is URL:http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/.
Cyrus Daboo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to see a standard protocol that all clients could
use. This would act as a 'wrapper' for whatever storage mechanism a
particular implemenation may want to use on the back-end, e.g. file
system, ACAP, IMSP, LDAP etc, but would provide sieve
I'm using sendmail 8.11.2 and cyrus imapd 2.0.11, currently using
"deliver" as the delivery agent. This forks two processes ("deliver"
and "lmtpd") for incoming mail, right? (assuming prefork=0) As far as
I can tell sendmail doesn't keep the LMTP connection up between
incoming connections
16 matches
Mail list logo
