erefore "_" is a valid character in the local-part
of an email name.
My mistake. My apologies for any inconvienence.
-- Michael --
- Original Message -
From: "Allan Rafuse" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Michael Fair" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 12:5
A few questions here. We have been running 1.6.24 in a hacked for so that we can have
virtual
users with username as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Our hacked form went through the input
and
converted any '.'s in the username to '+'. So in imap from:
1 LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass
would be translated
Well thats kind of cool with the "+" exention. Guess I'll just have to pick
a new character to use :). Do you know what LMTP does with the
@domain.com portion when found?
-Allan
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:36:22 +, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
Allan Rafuse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Why does
A few questions here. We have been running 1.6.24 in a hacked for so that we can have
virtual
users with username as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Our hacked form went through the input
and
converted any '.'s in the username to '+'. So in imap from:
1 LOGIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] pass
would be translated
