Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Also, I have
MIMEDefang (calling SpamAssassin and ClamAV virus scanner). Here are some
of the headers that get added to all of our mail.
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Status: No,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, James Miller wrote:
Are there any know issues between cyrus and mimedefang?
I run cyrus, sendmail, and MIMEDefang. I use the cyrusv2 mailer though,
I don't use procmail. I've used it with procmail too, but it's been a
while...
( and yes, the LOGFILE= part would go in the
James Miller wrote:
Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe? Also, I have
MIMEDefang (calling SpamAssassin and ClamAV virus scanner). Here are some
of the headers that get added to all of our mail.
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com /
On 21 Feb 2003, James Miller writes:
Would the LOGFILE statement go into the .procmailrc recipe?
Yes. Running the command man procmailrc will provide more details,
if you need them.
It seems to me LMTPD is rejecting the messages because of header
problems.
Only because what you are sending
I've discussed this problem some time ago, known as forking problem. Turned
out to be db3 locking problem or whatever. Anyway, here's something I
experience right now:
Let me begin with my system description.
It's Linux RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2-0.1.28smp running at dual p3/550
with 768 mb
Nick Ustinov ha escrito:
It's Linux RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2-0.1.28smp running at dual p3/550
and the system launches approx the same number of lmtpds.
The e-mails are being delivered, but EXTREMELY slow. I don't know where the
problem is, however the system is unable to deliver more
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 13:20
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: back to lmtpd problems
Nick Ustinov ha escrito:
It's Linux RedHat 7.0 with kernel 2.4.2-0.1.28smp running at dual p3/550
and the system launches approx the same number of lmtpds.
The e-mails are being
and I've been using it in many servers happilly. It supports cyrus,
lmtpd and avp.
Note however that you should not use avpkeeper, but instead the programe avcheck
made by Ralf Hildebrandt. It offers better performance and higher security.
Also, I only had problems combining avpkeeper and
-
From: Tarjei Huse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 17:15
To: Francesc Guasch
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: back to lmtpd problems (ot)
and I've been using it in many servers happilly. It supports cyrus,
lmtpd and avp.
Note however that you should not use
