are not
compliant to RFC... as far as I see...
Sieve vacation already uses name-addr or addr-spec, so I would suggest
this simple patch:
diff -Naur cyrus-imapd-2.4.18.orig/imap/lmtp_sieve.c
cyrus-imapd-2.4.18/imap/lmtp_sieve.c
--- cyrus-imapd-2.4.18.orig/imap/lmtp_sieve.c2015-07-06
05:38:
Hi,
I’m referring back to a post from 2009 for which I can’t find an answer:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/2009-March/030707.html
According to sieve/vacation RFCs 5228/5230 it is possible to add a
display-name in the :from parameter, for example:
vacation :from "My
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015, Patrick Goetz via Info-cyrus wrote:
I've been struggling with figuring out how to set up a sieve vacation reply
script. The documentation on this is pretty sparse, and the stuff I do find
doesn't work. For example,
I have a script that kind of does that. We needed
> On Dec 26, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Sebastian Hagedorn via Info-cyrus
> <info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I've been struggling with figuring out how to set up a sieve vacation
>> reply script. The documentation on this is pretty sparse, and th
I've been struggling with figuring out how to set up a sieve vacation
reply script. The documentation on this is pretty sparse, and the stuff
I do find doesn't work. For example,
[cyrus@www ~]$ sieveshell --user=resea...@episcopalarchives.org
--authname=cyrus localhost
connecting
Hi,
I've been struggling with figuring out how to set up a sieve vacation
reply script. The documentation on this is pretty sparse, and the stuff
I do find doesn't work. For example,
[cyrus@www ~]$ sieveshell --user=resea...@episcopalarchives.org
--authname=cyrus localhost
connecting
On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 10:20 +0100, Marcus Schopen wrote:
does sieve vacation understand a start and end date? Something like this
does not work:
---
require [date, relational, vacation];
if allof(currentdate :value ge date 2007-06-30,
currentdate :value le date 2007-07-07
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 08:39 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 10:20 +0100, Marcus Schopen wrote:
does sieve vacation understand a start and end date? Something like this
does not work:
---
require [date, relational, vacation];
if allof(currentdate :value ge
Quoting Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org:
On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 10:20 +0100, Marcus Schopen wrote:
does sieve vacation understand a start and end date? Something like this
does not work:
---
require [date, relational, vacation];
if allof(currentdate :value ge date 2007-06-30
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014, at 08:51 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
Quoting Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org:
On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 10:20 +0100, Marcus Schopen wrote:
does sieve vacation understand a start and end date? Something like this
does not work:
---
require [date
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 09:25:48AM -0500, James Cassell wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014, at 08:51 AM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
Quoting Adam Tauno Williams awill...@whitemice.org:
On Sun, 2014-12-28 at 10:20 +0100, Marcus Schopen wrote:
does sieve vacation understand a start and end date
Hi,
does sieve vacation understand a start and end date? Something like this
does not work:
---
require [date, relational, vacation];
if allof(currentdate :value ge date 2007-06-30,
currentdate :value le date 2007-07-07)
{ vacation :days 7 I'm away during the first week in July
Hi all,
it seems i'm not alone with this effect or bug in the SIEVE vacation
module.
On a cyrus-imap (feeded by EXIM) with virtual domains where usernames are
equal to email adresses i have the effect, that vacations are not sent out
when an incoming email is addressed to an alias
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:26:43PM +0200, Niels Dettenbach wrote:
Hi all,
it seems i'm not alone with this effect or bug in the SIEVE vacation
module.
On a cyrus-imap (feeded by EXIM) with virtual domains where usernames are
equal to email adresses i have the effect, that vacations
Am Freitag, 4. April 2014, 09:33:47 schrieben Sie:
require [vacation,regex];
vacation :days 7 :addresses [addre...@example.com, addre...@example.com]
text:
ahh! This syntax seem to work so far. Thank you!
I've tried/used things similiar to this (roundcube generated):
## Generated by
Hi,
we've been using cyrus for years in pam auth mode, with vacation scripts
working correctly.
We recently switched to virtdomains: userid using ldap authentication.
Since this switch, vacation scripts are never considered, while filters parts
of the script work fine.
Sieve scripts are usually
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 08:24 -0500, k...@rice.edu wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 07:59:07AM +0100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:22:54PM +0530, Ram wrote:
Can I configure sieve to send vacation responses for every message ..
rather than waiting for n days before
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 01:37:02PM +0530, Ramprasad wrote:
But our client requires that every mail to sa...@domain.comshould
immediately get a response ( Business requirements .. not technical )
Sieve is probably the wrong tool for the job.
Assuming that I have methods to avoid looping
Can I configure sieve to send vacation responses for every message ..
rather than waiting for n days before responding again to the same sender
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:22:54PM +0530, Ram wrote:
Can I configure sieve to send vacation responses for every message ..
rather than waiting for n days before responding again to the same sender
Ouch - why? There's a danger of mail loops, amongst other things.
Bron.
Cyrus Home Page:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 07:59:07AM +0100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:22:54PM +0530, Ram wrote:
Can I configure sieve to send vacation responses for every message ..
rather than waiting for n days before responding again to the same sender
Ouch - why? There's a danger
Can anyone tell me where the file(s) with list of email addresses that
have been sent a vacation reply lives in a debian installation? I can't
seem to find it.
Hi,
I think what you are looking for is deliver.db in $configdir. Don't know
on Debian but on my systems it's
Simon Matter wrote:
Can anyone tell me where the file(s) with list of email addresses that
have been sent a vacation reply lives in a debian installation? I can't
seem to find it.
Hi,
I think what you are looking for is deliver.db in $configdir. Don't know
on Debian but on my systems
Simon Matter wrote:
Can anyone tell me where the file(s) with list of email addresses that
have been sent a vacation reply lives in a debian installation? I can't
seem to find it.
Hi,
I think what you are looking for is deliver.db in $configdir. Don't know
on Debian but on my systems it's
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Can anyone tell me where the file(s) with list of email addresses that
have been sent a vacation reply lives in a debian installation? I can't
seem to find it.
Hi,
I think what you are looking for is deliver.db in $configdir. Don't know
on Debian but
Maria McKinley wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Can anyone tell me where the file(s) with list of email addresses that
have been sent a vacation reply lives in a debian installation? I
can't
seem to find it.
Hi,
I think what you are looking for is deliver.db in $configdir.
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Maria McKinley wrote:
I tried changing the name. Cyrus remade the file, and it didn't seem to
cause any problems, but unfortunately, it didn't help either.
Actually, don't try this at home. A few seconds after I sent this email,
my mail server started freaking out about
Can anyone tell me where the file(s) with list of email addresses that
have been sent a vacation reply lives in a debian installation? I can't
seem to find it.
thanks,
maria
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List
I have one user who cannot get their vacation filter to work. Other
filters work fine. I have tried moving their filter folder and
re-creating it, and that has not helped, so I don't think the problem is
the way squirrel mail created/edited the filter, or some corruption in
the files
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:49 -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[]
If I add a vacation statement (with a known working local email
address) as in
snip
require [ fileinto, vacation ];
vacation :days 7 :addresses [ u...@example.com ]
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 15:22 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
We are using quite simple sieve scripts for vacation and 2.3.7
Hi all!
I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
We are using quite simple sieve scripts for vacation and 2.3.7
duplicates (into the local inbox) all emails which trigger an
Hi all!
I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
We are using quite simple sieve scripts for vacation and 2.3.7
duplicates (into the local inbox) all emails which trigger
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:49 +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
[...]
I'm in the process of upgrading cyrus-imapd-2.2.13 (from
Debian-3.1/Sarge) to cyrus-imapd-2.3.7 (from RHEL-5/CentOS-5) on a
system with approx. 25k mailboxes.
We are using quite simple sieve scripts for vacation and 2.3.7
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
If I have the following sieve script, everything works fine and each
(non-Spam-)mail appears once in the INBOX (since we have the keep
there)
snip
require [ fileinto, vacation ];
if header :contains [ X-Spam-Flag ] [ YES ] {
--On 27. Mai 2009 22:42:30 -0400 Gottschalk, David dgot...@emory.edu
wrote:
Well, I tried to enable this same feature this evening in sendmail, but
ran into some problems. Forgive me as I am complete novice when it comes
to enabling this feature in sendmail. I enabled this in my sendmail.cf,
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 27. Mai 2009 22:42:30 -0400 Gottschalk, David
dgot...@emory.edu wrote:
Well, I tried to enable this same feature this evening in sendmail, but
ran into some problems. Forgive me as I am complete novice when it comes
to enabling this feature in sendmail. I
--On 28. Mai 2009 11:39:03 +0200 Garry ga...@glendown.de wrote:
You didn't actually edit the .cf file, did you? That's not how it
works ... you need to edit the .mc and generate the .cf.
He didn't, he put it in the .mc and m4'd it ...
Wouldn't the m4 command have thrown an error in that case
...@emory.edu
-Original Message-
From: Garry Glendown [mailto:ga...@glendown.de]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:18 PM
To: Gottschalk, David
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working (solved)
Gottschalk, David wrote:
I put the lines in my sendmail.mc file then built the sendmail.cf file.
I'm
david.gottsch...@emory.edu
-Original Message-
From: Garry [mailto:ga...@glendown.de]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:17 AM
To: Gottschalk, David
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working (solved)
Gottschalk, David wrote:
Oh, one thing I forgot to mention.
I got the unknown mailer error
Garry wrote:
define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrus')dnl
ifdef(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS',,
`define(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS', `deliver -e -f $f -m $h -- $u')')
dnl MAILER(`cyrus')dnl
Of course, that was
MAILER(`cyrus')dnl
Also, please note that the define/ifdef part was well above all the
other MAILER
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:21 -0400, Gottschalk, David wrote:
See, I'm using this entirely custom deliver script in .procmailrc, and
I think that is my problem. I think if Sieve doesn't get a proper from
address, it will not reply. The question is how do you know
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but only for doing the back-end
script stuff ... so I added the -D to the lmtpd line, which I
On Wed, May 27, Garry wrote:
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but only for doing the back-end
script stuff ... so I added
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:35 +0200, Carsten Hoeger wrote:
On Wed, May 27, Garry wrote:
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but
Carsten Hoeger wrote:
On Wed, May 27, Garry wrote:
Also, the logfile created by this line:
[..]
doesn't show up right away either ...
Actually, I just noticed that timsieved of course isn't even the process
responsible for doing any filtering, but only for doing the back-end
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Garry wrote:
Can someone please clarify what process' job it is to generate the mail
by calling sendmail? Is it lmtpd which I assumed? I really need to stop
wasting time on looking at the wrong places and got to move on to more
important work ...
lmtpd processes sieve
Well, found another post on this ... seems to be that depending on the
way the MTA does the local delivery causes vacation (and only vacation)
to work or not...
Originally, I had this in my .mc file:
define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrus')dnl
ifdef(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS',,
`define(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARGS',
-bounces+dgottsc=emory@lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of
Garry
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:45 PM
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working (solved)
Well, found another post on this ... seems to be that depending on the
way the MTA does the local delivery
@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
[mailto:info-cyrus-bounces+dgottsc=emory@lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of
Garry
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 4:12 PM
To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: Sieve: Vacation not working
I have a SuSE Enterprise 10 system set up, which is running smoothly ...
I have
Subject: Re: Sieve: Vacation not working
Gottschalk, David wrote:
Check out my thread going on this.
I'm having the same issue.
How do you hand off mail from Sendmail to Cyrus? I'm thinking that could be
my issue, maybe yours too.
I'm using the cyrus feature
define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrus
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:21 -0400, Gottschalk, David wrote:
See, I'm using this entirely custom deliver script in .procmailrc, and
I think that is my problem. I think if Sieve doesn't get a proper from
address, it will not reply. The question is how do you know if this is
occurring?
Sendmail
I have a SuSE Enterprise 10 system set up, which is running smoothly ...
I have Cyrus 2.2.12 on it, which too is working fine - IMAP, SASL-Auth,
the whole 9 yards ... even Sieve itself is fine, messages are moved to
the appropriate folders as directed in the Sieve config ...
Here's an excerpt
Wesley Craig wrote:
On 24 Nov 2008, at 01:51, ram wrote:
Is there a patch that fixes this value to 1
Find one attached. Is this in bugzilla? I couldn't find it... If
someone puts it there and marks it as a blocker, it will be fixed in
the next release.
:wes
At that time I just
On 24 Nov 2008, at 01:51, ram wrote:
Is there a patch that fixes this value to 1
Find one attached. Is this in bugzilla? I couldn't find it... If
someone puts it there and marks it as a blocker, it will be fixed
in the next release.
:wes
sieve-min.diff
Description: Binary data
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 12:18 +0100, Marco Colombo wrote:
ram wrote:
I have a default cyrus installation with cyrus-imapd-2.3 on centos 5
People use sieve to set their vacation responses
As per the configuration no response is sent for 1 day
-
cat
ram wrote:
I have a default cyrus installation with cyrus-imapd-2.3 on centos 5
People use sieve to set their vacation responses
As per the configuration no response is sent for 1 day
-
cat /usr/sieve/i/it/default.script
require vacation;
# Vacation
vacation :days 1
I have a default cyrus installation with cyrus-imapd-2.3 on centos 5
People use sieve to set their vacation responses
As per the configuration no response is sent for 1 day
-
cat /usr/sieve/i/it/default.script
require vacation;
# Vacation
vacation :days 1 :addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED]
email-filtering with sieve and after filtering I want to submit vacation
messages to the original sender.
Unfortunately sieve-vacation sends it's replies to the address in the
Return-Path header, which is my own address thus sending vacation
replies to myself and not to the originator
Hi,
I made some tests with sieve vacation and it works great !
But the record (timestamp) wrote on deliver.db from expiration time seems
only accept the minimum of 3 days !
Is this a feature ??
I'm using cyrus-imapd version 2.2.13 on a debian etch.
Thanks.
Cyrus Home Page: http
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Mike Eggleston might have said:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
Hi Joseph,
it would indeed be helpful if you posted the relevant section of your
sieve script. Nevertheless, two hints which might hopefully be useful:
1. Try to find out
Marcelo Terres wrote:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when the message come
,
2007/9/25, Marcelo Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when
:days 0 :addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] :subject Retorno
de mensagem Teste de mensagem de resposta;
Regards,
On 9/26/07, Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcelo Terres wrote:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users
vacation. Maybe I need a
module or something ???
Regards,
On 9/26/07, Martin Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Marcelo
Is the script activated? Is the synatax correct? Check with sieveshell.
Regards,
2007/9/25, Marcelo Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Marcelo Terres might have said:
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
I've been trying to get vacation working also. Is the :addresses [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
the address of the person we're looking to send a custom reply to or is this
the
Martin Schweizer schrieb:
Hello Marcelo
Is the script activated? Is the synatax correct? Check with sieveshell.
Regards,
2007/9/25, Marcelo Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users
with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when the message come to the user.
I'm sure that sieve is working cause
Hi
- Quote ---
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-07.txt
4.5. Address Parameter and Limiting Replies to Personal Messages
Vacation MUST NOT respond to a message unless the recipient user's
email address is in a To, Cc, Bcc, Resent
I think that addresses in this case is ':addresses
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. I'm putting my address in this line.
On 9/26/07, Mike Eggleston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Marcelo Terres might have said:
The script has an :addresses parameter not an :address. Is this a problem ?
In this case, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just an example, this is not
the real address.
On 9/26/07, Rudy Gevaert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcelo Terres wrote:
Yes, the directory is correct. If I put a forward filter there, the
message is forwarded correctly.
The problem is specifically with
, Marcelo Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from Horde) and
everything is working, except vacation. The sieve script is correct,
but nothing happens when the message come to the user.
I'm sure
Hello Marcelo
Is the script activated? Is the synatax correct? Check with sieveshell.
Regards,
2007/9/25, Marcelo Terres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm having a problem with sieve vacation.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.12 with postfix 2.2.10 and horde.
My users create the sieve filters with Ingo (from
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
Hi Joseph,
it would indeed be helpful if you posted the relevant section of your
sieve script. Nevertheless, two hints which might hopefully be useful:
1. Try to find out if anything in the chain between Sieve and your MTA
might
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
Mike!
I cannot see an :address parameter in your sieve script. Without that,
you will never see any vacation response being generated! (Refer to 2.
in my post.)
Duh, I expected the problem to be something simple, but I couldn't see
What value should I use to wild-card to every address?
No sure out of the top of my head ... AFAIK wildcards are an extra
module in Sieve, but not sure. If in doubt, try some RTFM. Or try with
one address to start with, so see some success in the first place. It
might be just *. You might
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Torsten Schlabach might have said:
What value should I use to wild-card to every address?
No sure out of the top of my head ... AFAIK wildcards are an extra
module in Sieve, but not sure. If in doubt, try some RTFM. Or try with
one address to start with, so see some
with sieve/vacation in
cyrus:
http://archives.devshed.com/forums/networking-100/cyrus-sieve-with-
vacation-does-not-go-1673174.html
http://www.usenet.com/newsgroups/comp.mail.imap/msg00608.html
http://www.webservertalk.com/archive202-2006-6-1548266.html
http://www.irbs.net/internet/info-cyrus
(imapd.conf) and the (Part of the) Sieve-Script. Maybe even
too, the way you deliver Mails to Cyrus.
Thank you for your time! - Yossie
Here are a few googled links reporting issues with sieve/vacation in
cyrus:
http://archives.devshed.com/forums/networking-100/cyrus-sieve-with-
vacation-does-not-go
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Janne Peltonen wrote:
5/week? Whee. We might achieve something remotely approaching that with
personalized bayesian filtering (a multi-discipline, internationaly
connected university receives quite a lot of ham that looks very much
like spam, so we are a bit paranoid
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:58:04PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Now I'd like to ask the people on this list about their experiences
using the sieve vacation module. The risks of automatically
responding to spam / automatically forwarding spam / ending up in
sorceror's apprentice mode
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:54:38AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
In my opinion, no amount of backscatter is acceptable, so I don't allow
user-configurable autoresponders or forwarding. My antispam measures
have reduced the amount that makes it to the user's inbox to about
5/week, so I will make
Janne Peltonen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:58:04PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Now I'd like to ask the people on this list about their experiences
using the sieve vacation module. The risks of automatically
responding to spam / automatically forwarding spam / ending up in
sorceror's
traditional pitfalls are more easy to avoid). So we
don't support sieve vacation, either.
Now I heard the people at MIT have reversed their policy on auto
responders abt a year ago (haven't confirmed this, though). Apparently
they're using sieve 07 (not confirmed this, either), which contains
sieve
to lists and other traditional pitfalls are more easy to avoid). So we
don't support sieve vacation, either.
[snip]
Now I'd like to ask the people on this list about their experiences
using the sieve vacation module. The risks of automatically
responding to spam / automatically forwarding
to a spammer that an address works - auto-answers
to lists and other traditional pitfalls are more easy to avoid). So we
don't support sieve vacation, either.
Now I'd like to ask the people on this list about their experiences
using the sieve vacation module. The risks of automatically
responding
Janne Peltonen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 07:47:28AM -0400, Jorey Bump wrote:
If you don't get much spam, sieve vacation is suitable.
But how much is much, in your opinion? Say, 4 spam messages per day per user,
with 50 000 users? Would that be much? If, during summer, 25% of our
Janne Peltonen wrote:
Now I'd like to ask the people on this list about their experiences
using the sieve vacation module. The risks of automatically
responding to spam / automatically forwarding spam / ending up in
sorceror's apprentice mode / ending up having our mail servers
blacklisted
What would be required to add an expiry date feature to sieve vacation
messages? The need is pretty clear: people set up a vacation message
when they begin their vacation, but forget to remove it when they
return. They have no indication in their e-mail reader that their
vacation message
Ethariel wrote:
Hello,
I've installed cyrus-imapd (2.2.13 on MDV 2007). Sieve scripts are
working fine except 'vacation'.
User 1 has a vacation script with days: 1
User 2 sents an email to user1 it receives an answer (the correct
vacation message).
Then after User2 can send email the same
Jeffrey McDonald schrieb:
Here is the sieve vacation instruction:
# Vacation
vacation :days 7 :addresses [[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] :subject not here I'm away. I will
return in 7 days. ;
Did you use require vacation?
The following
On 17.07.2007, at 17:30, Jeffrey McDonald wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use sieve to setup a vacation message. The important
parameters for delivery (from what I've gathered from a search of the
archive) are:
...
I don't see any errors in the log files and I see no message ever
recieved by
Hi Jeff,
On 18.07.2007, at 22:36, Jeffrey McDonald wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your response, I can't find any documentation about
clearing the vacation database for sieve, can you point me to the
command or documentation for that?
thanks in advance,
jeff
Delete the duplicate database (it's
great except sieve vacation. Sieve is
filtering mail properly, but when vacation is setup, I don't see any
attempt from sieve to actually create an e-mail. Here is the sieve
vacation instruction:
# Vacation
vacation :days 7 :addresses [[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Hello,
I've installed cyrus-imapd (2.2.13 on MDV 2007). Sieve scripts are working
fine except 'vacation'.
User 1 has a vacation script with days: 1
User 2 sents an email to user1 it receives an answer (the correct vacation
message).
Then after User2 can send email the same day or three days
I'm not sure. Maybe you have to put more than a address into brackets
(addr,addr) to group them.
What really is bothering me is that if I only have the [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
the brackets, and send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the rule works. But
if there is either only the firstname.lastname
Hi,
On 16.05.2007, at 18:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure. Maybe you have to put more than a address into brackets
(addr,addr) to group them.
What really is bothering me is that if I only have the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in
the brackets, and send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the rule
Hello,
I have a weird problem where sieve does not match properly the recipient
alias address when using the vacation rule.
Specifically: I run a CentOS4.4 Linux box with postfix (2.2.10-1.RHEL4.2)
+ cyrus-imapd (2.2.12-3.RHEL4.1). The rules are created via Squirrelmail
(1.4.10-1.el4) +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
5. Select Vacation, set the Addresses-textfield to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Click Move on to Step 4
[...]
[[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]] text:
I'm not sure. Maybe you have to put more than a address into brackets
(addr,addr) to group them.
I
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
