I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
to know how to execute cyrus tasks without cyradm (creating mailboxes,
setting/changing quota, remove mailboxes, etc).
All of these tasks, AFAIK, can be performed via IMAP. So I'd image they
are performed the same way
Jason Voorhees schrieb:
I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
to know how to execute cyrus tasks without cyradm (creating mailboxes,
setting/changing quota, remove mailboxes, etc). I was thinking about
cyradm + expect but it's just an idea by now.
Because
Hi:
Some months ago I was using Courier+Postfix+OpenLDAP+Phamm
(http://www.phamm.org).
I'm not developer but I understood a little of phamm's code to realize
that it would not be difficult to use it with Cyrus.
I'm planning to use Phamm again but this time with Cyrus. First I need
to know how
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote:
With ZFS your leaving a ton of stone-age worries behind. You can go
much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
and gaining some new worries along the way. while some are convinced that ZFS
is
the best thing ever others see it as trading a set of
Hi David,
If you want ZFS you have several choices, OS X (Leopard), as there is a
development version that supports RAID-Z and works quite well. You
can't boot off of it, but that will change in Snow Leopard.
Additionally you can use Opensolaris such as Nexenta, or you can use
fuse to get
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Hi David,
If you want ZFS you have several choices, OS X (Leopard), as there is a
development version that supports RAID-Z and works quite well. You
can't boot off of it, but that will change in Snow Leopard.
Additionally you can use Opensolaris
so you have OS X and Solaris (with opensolaris varients), that's not
a very wide
supproted base for running servers.
FreeBSD 7.x onwards has ZFS available natively. ZFS support in CURRENT
seems to have most of the latest stuff from OpenSolaris incorporated
and the FS seems to be pretty
David Lang wrote, at 09/18/2008 12:12 AM:
doign a quick google check on maildir it also appears that maildir is not as
standard as people think it is, it's defined almost entirely by the
implementation (DJB started it, but never worked to turn it into a standard
for
others to use)
This
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 22:28 -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
...
I debated writing a gui for Cyrus for administration, but I realized
that people implement Cyrus in so many different ways. Kerberos, LDAP,
*SQL, various forms of PAM. Then you add in virtual domains, and how
you might want
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 03:28 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for
On Sep 18, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Vincent Fox wrote:
All I know is this:
After running ZFS for the Cyrus mailstores for a year now I'd never
go back.
Same here, for over year now... four opteron servers to handle 25,000
accounts. All of those servers are Solaris 10 and cyrus lives and
lartc wrote:
hi,
well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ...
when install it for clients, i only leave a few pieces of functionality
(so they don't blow their foot off).
cheers
charles
17, 2008 1:17 PM
To: lartc
Cc: Cyrus Mailing List
Subject: Re: suggestion need to design an email system.
lartc wrote:
hi,
well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ...
when install it for clients
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Do Duc Huy wrote:
My question is about my second problem. It 's about antispam and antivirus.
I have used amavis for spam and virus filter. This can block virus very well
but it have no effect in blocking spam mail, I think.
Get the newest version of amavisd-new, and read
I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
comparable. Dovecot seemed to be slightly better at searching in the
mailbox, esp.
Heya :)
2008/9/17 Adam Tauno Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
comparable. Dovecot seemed
Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
only have read about it in the documentation, and not actually seen it
in action. But at least they
Hello,
2008/9/17 Simon Matter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
only have read about it in the documentation, and not
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.), yet I see no
distinctive
Wesley Craig wrote:
Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
With ZFS, inodes are among the many stone-age worries you leave behind.
;-)
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ:
Tel: (+84) 04 5 742 879
Fax: (+84) 04 5 742 857
Mobi: (+84) 0904 34 38 38
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Bakshi
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:17 PM
To: lartc
Cc: Cyrus Mailing List
Subject: Re: suggestion need to design
With ZFS your leaving a ton of stone-age worries behind. You can go
much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
Vincent Fox wrote:
Wesley Craig wrote:
Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
With ZFS, inodes are among the
Mobi: (+84) 0904 34 38 38
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Bakshi
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 1:17 PM
To: lartc
Cc: Cyrus Mailing List
Subject: Re: suggestion need to design an email system.
lartc wrote:
hi
lartc wrote:
hi,
snip
another important questing ; Is there
any webinterface which can manage the mail system based on LDAP ?
yes there is -- and it's great.
https://oss.gonicus.de/labs/gosa/
gosa manages your ldap, and therefore your mail system. takes a bit of
setup, but
hi,
well, you can edit the gosa config file to only show you the users and
their e-mail, etc. you're not obligated to use the entire system ...
when install it for clients, i only leave a few pieces of functionality
(so they don't blow their foot off).
cheers
charles
Cyrus Home Page:
27 matches
Mail list logo
