Re: Another question about MUPDATE server

2003-02-24 Thread Etienne Goyer
Thanks Rob for your answer so far. Concerning the replication process, we where thinking about using something like heartbeat to monitor the service. Once the master has been found inoperative, heartbeat should promote one of the replica as master, by running a script to restart the replica in

Re: Another question about MUPDATE server

2003-02-24 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: Thanks Rob for your answer so far. Concerning the replication process, we where thinking about using something like heartbeat to monitor the service. Once the master has been found inoperative, heartbeat should promote one of the replica as master,

Another question about MUPDATE server

2003-02-21 Thread Etienne Goyer
Greeting again, I would have another question concerning MUPDATE. The white-paper on Cyrus imapd Murder hinted about the possibility(1) of having your MUPDATE server replicating. If it is available, I would like to replicate the MUPDATE server for both scalability and automatic failover,

Re: Another question about MUPDATE server

2003-02-21 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: I would have another question concerning MUPDATE. The white-paper on Cyrus imapd Murder hinted about the possibility(1) of having your MUPDATE server replicating. If it is available, I would like to replicate the MUPDATE server for both scalability