On 07/30/2012 03:07 AM, Greg Banks wrote:
I should mention also that Bron has been talking for some time now about
storing modseqs on per-message annotations as a way to make replication
more efficient. I think this is an excellent idea and is easy enough to
do, because we have a good modseq
On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723
Thanks.
If these bugs are confirmed, it'd be great to have them fixed before
this extension is widely adopted (there are lots of potential, imo),
otherwise client implementations might be based
G'day,
On 30/07/2012, at 7:20, kael ka...@laposte.net wrote:
On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723
Implementing unsolicited METADATA responses at the same time would be
awesome, though.
Sheesh, give 'em an inch...
When I was
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012, at 09:36 AM, Greg Banks wrote:
G'day,
On 30/07/2012, at 7:20, kael ka...@laposte.net wrote:
On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723
Implementing unsolicited METADATA responses at the same time would
Hello,
Two errata were published for RFC 5464
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5464, and apparently
Cyrus implementation of the METADATA extension is buggy in the regard to
these errata.
- ErratumID 2785 :
a GETMETADATA (MAXSIZE 1024) INBOX (/shared/comment /private/comment)
a
On 07/25/2012 08:14 PM, kael wrote:
Two errata were published for RFC 5464
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5464, and apparently
Cyrus implementation of the METADATA extension is buggy in the regard to
these errata.
Tested on FastMail.fm.
--
kael
Cyrus Home Page:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012, at 08:14 PM, kael wrote:
Two errata were published for RFC 5464
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5464, and apparently
Cyrus implementation of the METADATA extension is buggy in the regard to
these errata.
