Richmond writes:
> Adam Sjøgren writes:
>
>> Richmond writes:
>>
>>> If I have in .gnus a structure like
>>>
>>> (setq gnus-select-method
>>>
>>> and then subsequently
>>>
>>> (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
>>>
>>> How do I remove the first server from the list? Should I just
Richmond wrote:
>> We need nil (and /dev/null) so why not nnnil?
>
> We needs The Knights Who Say nnnil!
Heroes of nnnight and nnnagic!
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Emanuel Berg writes:
> Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
Thanks it worked. I thought you had a repeating n key, but
it's really a thing, nnnil.
https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/gnus/nnnil.el
>>>
>>> What's nn anyway, network news?
>>
>> The naming is built on the
> That, the last thing, I didn't say tho.
>
> We need nil (and /dev/null) so why not nnnil?
And `ignore' etc ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>> Thanks it worked. I thought you had a repeating n key, but
>>> it's really a thing, nnnil.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/gnus/nnnil.el
>>
>> What's nn anyway, network news?
>
> The naming is built on the original protocol, nntp: Network
Emanuel Berg writes:
> Richmond wrote:
>
>> Thanks it worked. I thought you had a repeating n key, but
>> it's really a thing, nnnil.
>>
>> https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/gnus/nnnil.el
>
> What's nn anyway, network news?
The naming is built on the original protocol,
Richmond wrote:
> Thanks it worked. I thought you had a repeating n key, but
> it's really a thing, nnnil.
>
> https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/gnus/nnnil.el
What's nn anyway, network news?
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Adam Sjøgren wrote:
> The historical split between the primary select method and
> the secondary methods is more confusing to me :-)
Exactly.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Sergey writes:
> I wonder why simple 'nil is not accepted as well: it's extremely
> confusing.
nnnil is the "do nothing" backend, the name is similar to eg nnimap,
nnspool, and nnmbox.
The historical split between the primary select method and the secondary
methods is more confusing to me :-)
Adam Sjøgren writes:
> Richmond writes:
>
>> If I have in .gnus a structure like
>>
>> (setq gnus-select-method
>>
>> and then subsequently
>>
>> (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
>>
>> How do I remove the first server from the list? Should I just replace it
>> with the second
Adam Sjøgren writes:
> Richmond writes:
>
>> If I have in .gnus a structure like
>>
>> (setq gnus-select-method
>>
>> and then subsequently
>>
>> (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
>>
>> How do I remove the first server from the list? Should I just replace it
>> with the second
Richmond writes:
> If I have in .gnus a structure like
>
> (setq gnus-select-method
>
> and then subsequently
>
> (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
>
> How do I remove the first server from the list? Should I just replace it
> with the second server? I think the article numbers
12 matches
Mail list logo