On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:24:53 +0800, Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com
wrote:
Currently, i915_driver_load calls i915_driver_unload if drm_vblank_init
fails. However, we have not yet fully initialised drm_i915_private (eg.
-hangcheck_timer), so we're calling unload from an inconsistent
Hi folks,
I am a bit new to graphics, but had a few questions that I was hoping that
someone could answer for me. I hope this is the right forum to ask these
questions.
My interest is in seeing whether I can use the Intel integrated graphics part
for non-graphics (GPGPU) work, while driving
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 57e892d..af2de29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++
This has proven sufficient to recover from a hang of the GPU using the
gem_bad_blit test while at the KMS console then starting X. When
attempting the same during an X session, the timer doesn't appear to
trigger.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c |
This only applies to Ironlake.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index c8e0055..252bf7c
The specs say to do so.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
The pipe is always set to 8BPC, but here we were leaving whatever
previous bits were set by the BIOS in place.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |4 +++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 04:25:25 +, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
After some discussion with Eric on IRC, this is what I came up with
(which appears to work!)
The other way (fix up dead code eliminator) ended up deleting the same
gen code while also deleting C code. As I thought about
We were reading our 64-bit value in I915_READ64 and returning 32 bits
of it. The restoration of fence regs at resume then had a zero end
value, and the fence had no effect.
Version 2: Split register access functions into per-size versions
Sharing code between different sizes seemed reasonable
