Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove confusing GPIO vs PCH_GPIO

2018-07-22 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2018.07.19 17:20:15 +, De Marchi, Lucas wrote: > CC'ing gvt maintainers (and fixing Jani's address in CC). > > See below > > On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 13:01 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:16:53PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:10 AM

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree

2018-07-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 11:54:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > [Dave cc'd because this will probably turn up in the drm tree soon.] And now it has ... > After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > >

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for ALSA: hda/i915: Allow delayed i915 audio component binding

2018-07-22 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: ALSA: hda/i915: Allow delayed i915 audio component binding URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47024/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4523_full -> Patchwork_9744_full = == Summary - WARNING == Minor unknown changes

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for ALSA: hda/i915: Allow delayed i915 audio component binding

2018-07-22 Thread Patchwork
== Series Details == Series: ALSA: hda/i915: Allow delayed i915 audio component binding URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47024/ State : success == Summary == = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4523 -> Patchwork_9744 = == Summary - SUCCESS == No regressions found. External

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow delayed i915 audio component binding

2018-07-22 Thread Takashi Iwai
Currently HD-audio i915 audio binding doesn't support any delayed binding, and supposes that the i915 driver registers the component immediately. This has been OK, so far, but the work-in-progress change in i915 may introduce the asynchronous binding, which effectively delays the component