Re: [Intel-gfx] [4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-04-18 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/28/2016 02:39 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 03/02/2016 04:58 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> On 02/29/2016 04:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisb...@canonical.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Sonika, >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-03-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/02/2016 04:58 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 02/29/2016 04:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisb...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> Hi Sonika, >>> >>> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-03-02 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 02/29/2016 04:33 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisb...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Hi Sonika, >> >> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel >> bisect, it was found that reverting the f

[Intel-gfx] [4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid

2016-02-24 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Sonika, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 237ed86c693d8a8e4db476976aeb30df4deac74b Author: Sonika Jindal Date: Tue Sep 15 09:44:20 2015 +0530

Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 1/1] Revert Revert drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes

2013-10-31 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 10/31/2013 10:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Joseph Salisbury joseph.salisb...@canonical.com wrote: On 10/16/2013 05:02 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: It's by far not that simple. Jani is working on both the underlying bug and a better w/a. See https://bugzilla.kernel.org

[Intel-gfx] [v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 1/1] Revert Revert drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes

2013-10-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195483 This reverts commit 657445fe8660100ad174600ebfa61536392b7624. Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury joseph.salisb...@canonical.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch Cc: Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com Cc: David Airlie airl...@linux.ie Cc: sta

[Intel-gfx] [v3.10][v3.11][v3.12][Regression][PATCH 0/1] Revert Revert drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes

2013-10-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
create a patch specific for 3.12 if you think this is the best way to go. Thanks, Joe http://pad.lv/1195483 Joseph Salisbury (1): Revert Revert drm/i915: revert eDP bpp clamping code changes drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 18 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions

[Intel-gfx] [v3.8 Regression] Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued

2013-04-04 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Daniel, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found the following was the first bad commit: commit c2fb7916927e989ea424e61ce5fe617e54878827 Merge: 29de6ce 6f0c058 Author: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch Date: Mon Oct 22 14:34:51 2012 +0200

Re: [Intel-gfx] [v3.8 Regression] Merge tag 'v3.7-rc2' into drm-intel-next-queued

2013-04-04 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 04/03/2013 03:16 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Joseph Salisbury joseph.salisb...@canonical.com mailto:joseph.salisb...@canonical.com wrote: Hi Daniel, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found the following

Re: [Intel-gfx] Regression due to: drm/i915: no lvds quirk for Zotac ZDBOX SD ID12/ID13

2013-01-10 Thread Joseph Salisbury
picked from commit 9756fe38d10b2bf90c81dc4d2f17d5632e135364) Signed-off-by: Joseph Salisbury joseph.salisb...@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch