On 2/10/2023 1:21 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Jani,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:58:47PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Nirmoy Das wrote:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
but maybe let's wait until
Hi Jani,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:58:47PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> > For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
> > struct drm_device.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
>
> but maybe let's wait until we've synced up with
On 1/25/2023 8:50 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 24.01.2023 15:17, Nirmoy Das wrote:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Andrzej
On 24.01.2023 15:17, Nirmoy Das wrote:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda
---
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
On 1/19/2023 3:06 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 19.01.2023 10:58, Nirmoy Das wrote:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
It could be good start for boring refactoring :)
On 19.01.2023 10:58, Nirmoy Das wrote:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
It could be good start for boring refactoring :) of similar cases, for
example:
On 1/19/2023 11:58 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Nirmoy Das wrote:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
but maybe let's wait until we've synced up with drm-misc-next to avoid
the unnecessary conflict
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
> struct drm_device.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula
but maybe let's wait until we've synced up with drm-misc-next to avoid
the unnecessary conflict in drm-tip and linux-next?
>
> Cc:
For i915 functions pass struct drm_i915_private directly instead of
struct drm_device.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Suggested-by: Jani Nikula
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 8
10 matches
Mail list logo
