Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pxp: limit drm-errors or warnings on firmware API failures

2023-02-03 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 02/02/2023 17:11, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote: On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 08:43 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 02/02/2023 08:13, Alan Previn wrote: MESA driver is creating protected context on every driver handle initialization to query caps bit for app. So when running CI tests, they

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pxp: limit drm-errors or warnings on firmware API failures

2023-02-02 Thread Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 08:43 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 02/02/2023 08:13, Alan Previn wrote: > > MESA driver is creating protected context on every driver handle > > initialization to query caps bit for app. So when running CI tests, > > they are observing hundreds of drm_errors when

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pxp: limit drm-errors or warnings on firmware API failures

2023-02-02 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 02/02/2023 08:13, Alan Previn wrote: MESA driver is creating protected context on every driver handle initialization to query caps bit for app. So when running CI tests, they are observing hundreds of drm_errors when enabling PXP in .config but using SOC or BIOS configuration that cannot

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pxp: limit drm-errors or warnings on firmware API failures

2023-02-02 Thread Alan Previn
MESA driver is creating protected context on every driver handle initialization to query caps bit for app. So when running CI tests, they are observing hundreds of drm_errors when enabling PXP in .config but using SOC or BIOS configuration that cannot support PXP sessions. Update error handling