On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:00:46 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
Something to think about...
Missing SoB here...
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpnCoAAssejC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:21:27 -0700, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:00:46 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
Something to think about...
Missing SoB here...
Indeed, I'm still thinking about this one. I don't think it's ready yet.
-Chris
--
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:27:45 -0700, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:00:46 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
This looks like it fixes two bugs:
1) What if there is an error recorded before we start and so we
immediately service an IIR/EIR
This looks like it fixes two bugs:
1) What if there is an error recorded before we start and so we
immediately service an IIR/EIR upon intalling the IRQ. Did we generate
that error during initialisation or was that SEP? Now we do stuff before
we even install the IRQ so there is a possibility that
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:00:46 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
This looks like it fixes two bugs:
1) What if there is an error recorded before we start and so we
immediately service an IIR/EIR upon intalling the IRQ. Did we generate
that error during initialisation or was
