[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

2017-03-13 Thread Chris Wilson
From: Kenneth Graunke This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0 (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf always return -EINVAL if the flags are used. Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

2017-02-24 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0 > (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf > always return -EINVAL if the flags are used. > > Apparently, no userspace ever shipped

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

2017-02-15 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ke, 2017-02-15 at 10:40 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > > > > This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0 > > (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf > > always return -EINVAL

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

2017-02-15 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0 > (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf > always return -EINVAL if the flags are used. > > Apparently, no userspace ever shipped

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

2017-02-15 Thread Kenneth Graunke
This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0 (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf always return -EINVAL if the flags are used. Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature: I checked the git history of Mesa,

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop support for I915_EXEC_CONSTANTS_* execbuf parameters.

2017-02-14 Thread Kenneth Graunke
This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0 (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf always return -EINVAL if the flags are used. Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature: I checked the git history of Mesa,