From: Kenneth Graunke
This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
(indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
> (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
> always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
>
> Apparently, no userspace ever shipped
On ke, 2017-02-15 at 10:40 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> >
> > This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
> > (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
> > always return -EINVAL
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
> (indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
> always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
>
> Apparently, no userspace ever shipped
This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
(indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature:
I checked the git history of Mesa,
This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
(indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature:
I checked the git history of Mesa,