On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:55:27PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
> type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
> definition has a return type of int.
>
> The mismatched return type breaks
All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
definition has a return type of int.
The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the underlying
function definitions do not match the
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 01:55:27PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
>> All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
>> type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
>> definition has a return type
On 13.09.2022 22:55, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
All of the functions used for intel_dvo_dev_ops.mode_valid have a return
type of enum drm_mode_status, but the mode_valid field in the struct
definition has a return type of int.
The mismatched return type breaks forward edge kCFI since the
