On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:02:57AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
From: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
I've sent this patch several times for various reasons. It essentially
cleans up a lot of code where we need to do something per ring, and want
to query whether or not the ring exists on that
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:46:22PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
-cleanup_vebox_ring:
- intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(dev_priv-ring[VECS]);
-cleanup_blt_ring:
- intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(dev_priv-ring[BCS]);
-cleanup_bsd_ring:
- intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(dev_priv-ring[VCS]);
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:50:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:46:22PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
-cleanup_vebox_ring:
- intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(dev_priv-ring[VECS]);
-cleanup_blt_ring:
- intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(dev_priv-ring[BCS]);
-cleanup_bsd_ring:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 08:03:25AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:50:39AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:46:22PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
-cleanup_vebox_ring:
- intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(dev_priv-ring[VECS]);
-cleanup_blt_ring:
-
From: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
I've sent this patch several times for various reasons. It essentially
cleans up a lot of code where we need to do something per ring, and want
to query whether or not the ring exists on that hardware.
It has various uses coming up, but for now it shouldn't
From: Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net
I've sent this patch several times for various reasons. It essentially
cleans up a lot of code where we need to do something per ring, and want
to query whether or not the ring exists on that hardware.
It has various uses coming up, but for now it shouldn't
