[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use pipe_name() instead of the pipe number

2013-10-16 Thread Damien Lespiau
Yet other direct usages of the pipe number instead of pipe_name(). We've been tracking them lately but managed to miss these last ones. v2: Catch them all! (Ville) Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com (v1) Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lesp...@intel.com ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use pipe_name() instead of the pipe number

2013-10-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:45:43PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: Yet another direct usage of the pipe number instead of pipe_name(). We've been tracking them lately but managed to miss this one. Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lesp...@intel.com Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä