On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:18:23 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
As we failed to update the dpms_mode after modeset, where it is presumed
to have been changed to DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON by the upper layers the dpms state
on the crtc became inconsistent with its actual active state.
On Wed, 04 May 2011 14:20:27 -0700, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 May 2011 20:40:37 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
We can remove dpms_mode in favour of solely using active.
That sounds like a good plan.
And what about the intel_dp-dpms_mode
As we failed to update the dpms_mode after modeset, where it is presumed
to have been changed to DRM_MODE_DPMS_ON by the upper layers the dpms state
on the crtc became inconsistent with its actual active state. This
notably confused code and left the pipe active when it was meant to be
disabled,
