Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/uc: Rename intel_?uc_{setup, load}() to _init_hw()

2017-02-15 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ti, 2017-02-14 at 17:15 +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > GuC historically has two "startup" functions called _init() and _setup() > > Then HuC came with it's _init() and _load(). > > To make naming more consistent this commit renames intel_guc_setup() and > intel_huc_load() to *uc_init_hw() as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/uc: Rename intel_?uc_{setup, load}() to _init_hw()

2017-02-14 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > GuC historically has two "startup" functions called _init() and _setup() > > Then HuC came with it's _init() and _load(). > > To make naming more consistent this commit renames intel_guc_setup() and > intel_huc_load() to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/uc: Rename intel_?uc_{setup, load}() to _init_hw()

2017-02-14 Thread Michal Wajdeczko
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 05:15:37PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > GuC historically has two "startup" functions called _init() and _setup() > > Then HuC came with it's _init() and _load(). > > To make naming more consistent this commit renames intel_guc_setup() and > intel_huc_load() to

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/uc: Rename intel_?uc_{setup, load}() to _init_hw()

2017-02-14 Thread Arkadiusz Hiler
GuC historically has two "startup" functions called _init() and _setup() Then HuC came with it's _init() and _load(). To make naming more consistent this commit renames intel_guc_setup() and intel_huc_load() to *uc_init_hw() as it it seams more fitting - they are called from the