On Sun, 01 May 2011 17:26:11 +0100
Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:12:59 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Treat it like Sandy Bridge in a few places.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:12:59 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Treat it like Sandy Bridge in a few places.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
On Sun, 01 May 2011 17:26:11 +0100, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
Perhaps if you do the s/IS_GEN6/IS_SNADYBRIDGE/ fixes first it will become
much clearer? :)
The only question is one of regressions; getting the cleanups tested in
isolation from the IVB patches. That seems
Treat it like Sandy Bridge in a few places.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:12:59 -0700, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
Treat it like Sandy Bridge in a few places.
gen = 6?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpqFHB2q8tev.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
