Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute

2010-12-08 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:08:04 +, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:34:24 +0100, Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org wrote: Does that mean that the kernel regression will not be fixed/worked-around for old userspace? I think there is some confusion in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute

2010-12-05 Thread Florian Mickler
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the previous monitor status must be recorded in the connector-status value instead of being discarded. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute

2010-12-05 Thread Keith Packard
On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:27:43 +0100, Florian Mickler flor...@mickler.org wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the previous monitor status must be recorded in the connector-status

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute

2010-11-26 Thread Keith Packard
In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the previous monitor status must be recorded in the connector-status value instead of being discarded. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c |7 --- 1 files changed, 4