[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-10-15 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, here goes couple display fixes for this last round of fixes before -rc1 drm-intel-next-fixes-2020-10-15: - Set all unused color plane offsets to ~0xfff again (Ville) - Fix TGL DKL PHY DP vswing handling (Ville) The following changes since commit

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-10-02 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes our first next-fixes. Please be aware this includes both drm-intel-next and drm-intel-gt-next. Also, most of patches from drm-intel-gt-next were accumulated for not being part of current drm-intel-fixes flow while we are defining the new split and flow. So, there

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-09-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, here goes our last pull request targeting 5.10. drm-intel-next-2020-09-17: Driver Changes: - Reduce INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED to just removed outputs treating it as disconnected (Ville) - Introducing new AUX, DVO, and TC ports and refactoring code around hot plug interrupts

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-08-26 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, here goes the first pull request towards 5.10: As requested, the gem patches have been separated into a drm-intel/topic/drm-intel-gem-next that will be sent separately by the gem team later. Thanks, Rodrigo. drm-intel-next-2020-08-24-1: UAPI Changes: - Introduce a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-08-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Dave Airlie wrote: > Like this stuff has been getting past me for years but I'm not happy > about it anymore, I'm going to just be grumpy asshole going forward. > If we introduced scheduler races in linux-next, I want to see reverts, > and reverts only until we stopped

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-08-10 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 02:26, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > (Covering for Jani here for drm-intel-next-fixes) > > 5 new commits over drm-intel-next here. > > Fix for KASAN detected race condition and linux-next scheduler > WARNs. Patch to avoid IRQ spinlock and Cc: stable PMU

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-07-30 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, (Covering for Jani here for drm-intel-next-fixes) 5 new commits over drm-intel-next here. Fix for KASAN detected race condition and linux-next scheduler WARNs. Patch to avoid IRQ spinlock and Cc: stable PMU refcount update. CI machinery needed some kicking, so results didn't

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-07-15 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jani Nikula wrote: > > > Argh, failed to mention: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Lee Shawn C (1): > > drm/i915/mst: filter out the display mode exceed sink's capability > > The above depends on: > > > Lyude Paul (1): > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-07-15 Thread Jani Nikula
Argh, failed to mention: On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Jani Nikula wrote: > Lee Shawn C (1): > drm/i915/mst: filter out the display mode exceed sink's capability The above depends on: > Lyude Paul (1): > drm/probe_helper: Add drm_connector_helper_funcs.mode_valid_ctx Which has changes

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-07-15 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel - The 2nd and presumably the last i915 feature pull for v5.9. drm-intel-next-2020-07-15: drm/i915 features for v5.9, batch #2 Highlights: - Very early DG1 enabling (Abdiel, Lucas, Anusha) Gem/GT: - Fix spinlock recursion on signaling a signaled request (Chris) - Perf: Use GTT

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-07-02 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel - Here's the first batch of i915 features for v5.9. BR, Jani. drm-intel-next-2020-07-02: drm/i915 features for v5.9 Highlights: - Rocket Lake (RKL) platform enabling (Matt Roper, Lucas, José, Aditya) Gem/GT: - Numerous selftest fixes and improvements (Chris) - TGL, RKL,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-06-10 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2020-06-10 12:37:00) > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > Sending this one early for it to hopefully make it in before -rc1. > > Two important fixes: OOPS fix that was missing "Fixes:" tag and > not picked up earlier. Also fix for a use-after-free in cmdparser. > > Additional fixup

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-06-10 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Sending this one early for it to hopefully make it in before -rc1. Two important fixes: OOPS fix that was missing "Fixes:" tag and not picked up earlier. Also fix for a use-after-free in cmdparser. Additional fixup to module param types. Regards, Joonas ***

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-06-04 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Fixes use-after free on display global state tracking. Then the removal of write bits from sysfs files where changed value is not reflected anywhere. Two scheduler fixes with deps that are Cc: stable. Includes the GVT pull which has two build warning fixes at this time.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-05-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Two bigger fixes to corner case kernel access faults and three workload scheduling fixups this week. CI_DINF_191 at: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-intel-next-fixes/combined-alt.html? I got gvt-next-fixes pull today, I'll pull it next week so it has time to run through

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-05-20 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, On top of the drm-intel-next PR one fix for TypeC mode resets and two compile time warning fixes. CI results for your viewing: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-intel-next-fixes/combined-alt.html CI_DINF_189 = drm-intel-next pull CI_DINF_190 = this pull (3 patches) There

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-05-15 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Here's the last batch heading to v5.8. Indeed a lot of enabling and fixes building on the previous prepping. One cross-subsystem patch to video/hdmi for DRM infoframe unpacking. One sysfs patch to add readout and ability to restore of kernel compilation time default engine

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-05-14 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Dave Airlie (2020-05-14 04:28:17) > On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 03:10, Joonas Lahtinen > wrote: > > > > Ping for merging this? If there are no issues, I'd prefer to pull in > > next gvt-next and tag the final pull sooner than later. > > Can you check that I'm correct and this isn;'t in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-05-13 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 03:10, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Ping for merging this? If there are no issues, I'd prefer to pull in > next gvt-next and tag the final pull sooner than later. Can you check that I'm correct and this isn;'t in patchwork. I've checked both the dri-devel and intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-05-13 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Ping for merging this? If there are no issues, I'd prefer to pull in next gvt-next and tag the final pull sooner than later. Regards, Joonas Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2020-04-30 15:49:04) > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > Fix for performance regression GitLab #1698: Iris Plus 655 and > 4K screen. Missing

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-04-30 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Fix for performance regression GitLab #1698: Iris Plus 655 and 4K screen. Missing workarounds for Tigerlake, and a fix for DP display audio WA. Unbreaking enable_dpcd_backlight, fixes to power code for Icelake+. Improvements to the soft-RC6 code to improve power efficiency, a

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-04-17 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, This pull contains a backmerge of drm-next and pulls the phy-compliance branch from Maarten. On the uAPI front, drop some machine generated perf OA configs from 915 now that they mostly passed from userspace. Add new perf OA interfaces to limit CPU overhead and to allow

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-04-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Couple display fixes, including vswing table and display TypeC port in TBT mode fix for ICL+ A few GT/GEM alloc/reloc fixes with one to flush all the reloc_gpu batch which has cc:stable #5.2 Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2020-04-08: - Flush all the reloc_gpu batch (Chris) -

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-04-02 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2020-04-02: Only gvt fixes on this round: - Fix non-privilege access warning (Tina) - Fix display port type (Tina) - BDW cmd parser missed SWTESS_BASE_ADDRESS (Yan) - Bypass length check of LRI (Yan) - Fix one klocwork warning (Tina) Thanks,

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2020-03-27 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2020-03-27: Fixes for instability on Baytrail and Haswell; Ice Lake RPS; Sandy Bridge RC6; and few others around GT hangchec/reset; livelock; and a null dereference. Thanks, Rodrigo. The following changes since commit

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next for 5.7-rc1

2020-03-13 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes drm-intel-next-2020-03-13: UAPI Changes: On i915 we have a new UAPI to allow userspace to specify CS ring buffer size on construction (I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_RINGSIZE) and also new sysfs entries exposing various engine properties GVT Changes: On GVT we have VFIO edid

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-02-25 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, I do regret for taking so long for this first pull request. It accumulated over 400 patches with many code refactors, specially around gpu hangs detection/recover/debugability; display watermark handling; drm logs and warns; and our display conversion to use drm_i915_private

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes for v5.6-rc2

2020-02-13 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel - Most of these were aimed at a "next fixes" pull already during the merge window, but there were issues with the baseline I used, which resulted in a lot of issues in CI. I've regenerated this stuff piecemeal now, adding gradually to it, and it seems healthy now. Due to the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-01-14 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-01-14 11:43:22) >> >> Hi Dave & Daniel - >> >> Last batch for v5.6, slightly delayed I'm afraid. > > I'd like to close https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738 > for 5.6, otherwise we'll have some more nasty emails

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-01-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-01-14 11:43:22) > > Hi Dave & Daniel - > > Last batch for v5.6, slightly delayed I'm afraid. I'd like to close https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738 for 5.6, otherwise we'll have some more nasty emails from bewildered users/devs.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2020-01-14 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel - Last batch for v5.6, slightly delayed I'm afraid. drm-intel-next-2020-01-14: Final drm/i915 features for v5.6: - DP MST fixes (José) - Fix intel_bw_state memory leak (Pankaj Bharadiya) - Switch context id allocation to xarray (Tvrtko) - ICL/EHL/TGL workarounds (Matt Roper,

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-12-23 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel - The first, and huge, i915 feature pull for v5.6. We really need to fix dim to allow continuous tagging, and properly handle multiple tags in a single pull request. Writing changelogs for pulls like this becomes daunting. Consequently, the changelog below is more like a

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-12-05 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Final one for 5.5-rc1. A fix for EHL port D programming (DDI-D) and a couple of CI fixes for GEM contexts. This includes the GVT fixes PR with one command parser fix and one WARN splat fix. Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-12-05: - Includes

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-11-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Most importantly we have the fix to power regression that was introduced by the security fixes. Then fix for query uAPI and increase in request pre-emption timeout to accommodate super heavy benchmarks. Couple of display voltage programming fixes too. Thanks to Chris for

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-11-22 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, A quick fixup amendment to the previous PR. gem_exec_reloc/basic-range got broken in CI, so we've issued a patch revert the offending commit for now. Once the results for CI_DINF_163 appear here, and the timeouts seen in last three CI_DINF_ are green, feel free to pull this:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-11-22 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2019-11-20 22:40:35) > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > NOTE: CI shard results are delayed, bu I'm sending this > already because I'll travel tomorrow. I'll let you know > if the results look OK or not. Or you can look up > CI_DINF_162 results check at: > >

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-11-20 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, NOTE: CI shard results are delayed, bu I'm sending this already because I'll travel tomorrow. I'll let you know if the results look OK or not. Or you can look up CI_DINF_162 results check at: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-intel-next-fixes/combined-alt.html This was

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-11-14 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Here comes the set of fixes for drm-intel-next. Quite a few fixes after a silent last week. I'll do the backmerge of the BCX fixes from Linus's tree next and send it as an extra PR. Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-11-14: - PMU "Frequency" is reported as

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-11-07 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, A quiet start. Hopefully stays that way :) RCU tracking fix and suspend GEM_BUG_ON fix with dependencies. Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-11-07: One RCU fix and fix for suspend GEM_BUG_ON (with dependencies). The following changes since commit

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-11-01 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Here goes the final feature pull request for 5.5. Adding a new uAPI to support cleanup of long running workloads when process is killed. Adds fake lmem region code under DRM_I915_UNSTABLE Kconfig protection to make iGFX behave like local memory device. For testing

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-10-21 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Another feature pull, I'll send the final one next week. New uAPI for OA features to support VK_INTEL_performance_query, Mesa changes are at: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/merge_requests/932 Fixes for black/blue screen issues, Tigerlake enabling, HDR for DP

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-10-07 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Back from XDC, so here comes the first bunch of features. For uAPI: immutable zpos plane property added, disallow userptr import of GGTT mmapped buffer and disallow tiling Other than that loads of early Tigerlake enabling and many Icelake fixups. DP MST and PSR fixes as well

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-09-27 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, This should've gone out yesterday, but apparently I had some issue with my mutt here. Anyway, nothing that couldn't wait for rc2 Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-09-26: - Fix concurrence on cases where requests where getting retired at same time as resubmitted to HW -

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-09-19 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-09-19: - Extend old HSW workaround to fix some GPU hangs on Haswell GT2 - Fix return error code on GEM mmap. - White list a chicken bit register for push constants legacy mode on Mesa - Fix resume issue related to GGTT restore - Remove

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-09-11 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-09-11: Few fixes on GGTT and PPGTT around pin, locks, fence and vgpu. This also includes GVT fixes with two recent fixes: one for recent guest hang regression and another for guest reset fix. Thanks, Rodrigo. The following changes since

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-08-23 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes the final pull request targeting 5.4. It's important to highlight that we got a conflict on a backmerge yesterday which had already been solved on linux-next with a fix up patch: From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:39 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] drm:

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-08-23 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, (atempt v2: for some reason my dim didn't recognized the path apparently ) Here goes the final pull request targeting 5.4. It's important to highlight that we got a conflict on a backmerge yesterday which had already been solved on linux-next with a fix up patch: From:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-08-22 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 05:29, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes the final pull request targeting 5.4. For some reason patchwork hasn't picked this up. or if it has I can't see it. Not sure whether it was the earlier patch code in it or something else malformed. Dave.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-08-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes the first pull request targeting 5.4. It mostly comes with a lot of platform enabling patches and reworks and simplification around locking mechanisms, ppgtt allocation, engines and intel_gt in general. There were 2 silent backmerges that should be transparent for

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-06-19 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel, final i915 feature pull for v5.3. While I'll follow up with i915 fixes leading to the v5.3 release, I'll pass the drm-intel-next baton to Rodrigo who'll take care of v5.4. BR, Jani. drm-intel-next-2019-06-19: Features: - HDR support (Uma, Ville) - Add I2C symlink under HDMI

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-05-24 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave, Daniel - First i915 feature pull for v5.3. BR, Jani. drm-intel-next-2019-05-24: Features: - Engine discovery query (Tvrtko) - Support for DP YCbCr4:2:0 outputs (Gwan-gyeong) - HDCP revocation support, refactoring (Ramalingam) - Remove DRM_AUTH from IOCTLs which also have

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-05-15 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, A fix to close a race opportunity between IRQ handler and RCU. Two fixes that are also stable, disabling FBC on GLK and HSW EDP fastset correction. These patches definitely caused conflicts when merged, resolutions should be all good. Regards, Joonas ***

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-05-09 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Still rather quiet, most issues seem to have been fixed during CI testing. For i915, just two fixes to the request semaphore ordering code. For GVT a couple regression and static checker fixes. Best Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-05-09: - Two fixes for the

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-05-02 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, A quick fix to unbreak media driver, worthy inclusion before the merge window. Best Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-05-02: - Whitelist a register to avoid media driver from hanging The following changes since commit 879a4e70f96a26a9368a3caed2f552aa67105852:

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-04-30 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Just one fix to fix Icelake CSC programming (fixes loss of blue channel). Best Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-04-30: - Fix to Icelake CSC losing blue channel The following changes since commit 447811a686e8da7325516a78069ccfbd139ef1a7: drm/i915/icl: Fix

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-04-25 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Just one use-after-free fix and Icelake DP programming fix. Best Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-04-25: - Use after free fix during GEM_CREATE when reporting back object size - Icelake DP register programming order fix The following changes since commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-04-18 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:04:26AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > - Suppress spurious combo PHY B warning (Vile) That's putting it a bit strong :) -- Ville Syrjälä Intel ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-04-18 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, A bag of Icelake fixes still. As the biggest thing software frequency control was found out to be ineffective due to register change. We've got GEM_BUSY regression fix (noticed by media folks) and reset handling improvements. For display there's the HDR work and plenty of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-03-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Dave Airlie (2019-03-28 04:09:56) > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 22:49, Joonas Lahtinen > wrote: > > > > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > > > First batch of features for 5.2, tagged last week. > > I asked on irc, but got no answer I saw, >

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-03-28 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, Here's a pull request with a further drop of features. Sending this instead of the build warning fix to avoid diverging the trees. To avoid such build warnings in futore, I'll talk about doing a non-debug build of the PR tags. The build warning only occurred when selftests were

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-03-27 Thread Dave Airlie
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 22:49, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi Dave & Daniel, > > First batch of features for 5.2, tagged last week. I asked on irc, but got no answer I saw, /home/airlied/devel/kernel/dim/src/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c:698:12: warning: ‘context_barrier_task’ defined

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-03-25 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave & Daniel, First batch of features for 5.2, tagged last week. Most notably there are a lot of Icelake fixes that finally lead to removal of alpha_support protection for it. We're also adding Cometlake PCI IDs (Gen9 ~= Coffeelake), so those platforms should be supported. Then we have HDCP

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2019-03-12 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2019-03-12: - HDCP state handling in ddi_update_pipe - Protect i915_active iterators from the shrinker - Reacquire priolist cache after dropping the engine lock - (Selftest) Always free spinner on __sseu_prepare error - Acquire breadcrumb ref

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-02-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, This is the last batch from us targeting 5.1 Here goes drm-intel-next-2019-02-07: UAPI Changes: - Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to userspace for Ice Lake in order to allow userspace to reconfigure the subslice config per context basis. (Tvrtko, Lionel) Driver Changes: -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-02-05 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:47:36AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: >> Quoting Dave Airlie (2019-02-04 07:02:07) >> > On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 18:29, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi Dave and Daniel, >> > > >> > > Here goes another pull request for 5.1.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-02-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 10:47:36AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Quoting Dave Airlie (2019-02-04 07:02:07) > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 18:29, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > > > Here goes another pull request for 5.1. > > > > dim complained: > > > > Chris committed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-02-04 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Dave Airlie (2019-02-04 07:02:07) > On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 18:29, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > Here goes another pull request for 5.1. > > dim complained: > > Chris committed this without an S-O-B, now because it's all Intel this > probably doesn't matter, so

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-02-03 Thread Dave Airlie
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 18:29, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes another pull request for 5.1. dim complained: Chris committed this without an S-O-B, now because it's all Intel this probably doesn't matter, so I'll pull it, put please try and let it not happen again.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-02-02 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes another pull request for 5.1. Maybe I will still send another next week. This pull also include a GVT one with: " Here is gvt-next stuff. This includes Coffeelake support for GVT, making kvmgt as self load module to have better dependence with vfio/mdev, with some

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-01-28 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, This pull includes the tag as described below and the GVT stuff, which " includes Coffeelake support for GVT, making kvmgt as self load module to have better dependence with vfio/mdev, with some const treatment and kernel type change. " Also please notice that we have a drm color

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2019-01-14 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave and Daniel, Here goes first pull request targeting 5.1 made out of 2 tags: drm-intel-next-2019-01-10: - Unwind failure on pinning the gen7 PPGTT (Chris) - Fastset updates to make sure DRRS and PSR are properly enabled (Hans) - Header include clean-up (Brajeswar, Jani) - Improvements and

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-12-26 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave & Daniel - These GVT fixes missed the main pull request. drm-intel-next-fixes-2018-12-27: GVT fixes for v4.21-rc1 BR, Jani. The following changes since commit e69aa5f9b97f7f871643336deb281db5cb14878b: Merge tag 'drm-misc-next-2018-12-06' of

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-12-04 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave, last i915 changes for -next. drm-intel-next-2018-12-04: Final drm/i915 changes for v4.21: - ICL DSI video mode enabling (Madhav, Vandita, Jani, Imre) - eDP sink count fix (José) - PSR fixes (José) - DRM DP helper and i915 DSC enabling (Manasi, Gaurav, Anusha) - DP FEC enabling (Anusha)

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-11-23 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave - This one superseeds and includes everything in [1] as requested, and is thus pretty big. There are a number of commits that touch non-i915 files, but all relevant acks should be in place. There's also a drm-next backmerge in there. BR, Jani. [1]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next for v4.21/v5.1

2018-11-18 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 20:21, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > Hi Dave - > > I just tagged this minutes ago, but I'm sending this now because I'll be > out for about a week. I don't expect you to pull this until some time > after -rc1 anyway. I'm asking Joonas and Rodrigo to tell you if this > one's a go

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next for v4.21/v5.1

2018-11-02 Thread Jani Nikula
Hi Dave - I just tagged this minutes ago, but I'm sending this now because I'll be out for about a week. I don't expect you to pull this until some time after -rc1 anyway. I'm asking Joonas and Rodrigo to tell you if this one's a go or a no go. There's a couple of backmerges in there, and I'd

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-25 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave, One fix to avoid applying link retraining workaround on eDP monitors that was missing Fixes: (kindly pointed out by Jani) in addition to the patches in previous PR. I also got GVT PR for -next-fixes, but it had an issue with S-o-bs, so I'll include it then in -fixes pull. Regards,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:38 PM Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Here are the promised MST fixes that were missing due to being > in i915 tree, yet outside i915 directory. > > Further explanation in the previous PR's thread. fwiw, lgtm. Cheers, Daniel > > Regards, Joonas > > *** > >

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-19 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave, Here are the promised MST fixes that were missing due to being in i915 tree, yet outside i915 directory. Further explanation in the previous PR's thread. Regards, Joonas *** drm-intel-next-fixes-2018-10-19: - The missing 4 MST patches that tooling didn't pick from drm core/nouveau

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-19 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-10-19 10:05:32) > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:59 AM Joonas Lahtinen > wrote: > > > > Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-10-18 22:32:00) > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:57 PM Joonas Lahtinen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > > > Here comes the final set of fixes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-19 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:59 AM Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-10-18 22:32:00) > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:57 PM Joonas Lahtinen > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > Here comes the final set of fixes under -next-fixes umbrella. > > > Next one will be then from

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-19 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Quoting Daniel Vetter (2018-10-18 22:32:00) > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:57 PM Joonas Lahtinen > wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > Here comes the final set of fixes under -next-fixes umbrella. > > Next one will be then from -fixes, assuming a release next Sun. > > > > Fixes for bunch of display

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:57 PM Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Here comes the final set of fixes under -next-fixes umbrella. > Next one will be then from -fixes, assuming a release next Sun. > > Fixes for bunch of display related issues reported by users, then the > MST fixes that were

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-18 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave, Here comes the final set of fixes under -next-fixes umbrella. Next one will be then from -fixes, assuming a release next Sun. Fixes for bunch of display related issues reported by users, then the MST fixes that were dropped from Rodrigos PR + further Icelake fixes and proactive

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-10-04 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave, Here comes -fixes for drm-next. One compiler warning fix and adding back a removed max stride check, nothing end user visible. Regards, Joonas PS. Travelling next week, so I'll skip PR unless there's something big. --- drm-intel-next-fixes-2018-10-04: Compiler warning fix and

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-09-27 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave, Here's the second and final set of changes for v4.20, tagged last Friday before -rc5. We run it through the testing with the CI farm machines and found no regressions. Most user noticeable things are MythTV video stuttering regression fix for older hardware, black screen fix on resume

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-09-07 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
Hi Dave, Here's the first batch of changes for v4.20. Nothing too special. Notable things are more Icelake enabling/fixing patches and PPGTT enabling for some older platforms. Icelake is still behind alpha_support flag as we have the code in upstream but extensive testing is pending hardware

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-08-24 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, This is the pull request that I tried to send few days ago, but apparently I had some issue with my mutt/smtp and it didn't go through. Well, I don't think that there is anything critical that cannot wait another week or -rc2 Anyway I'm sending just in case, for the record, and to try

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-08-16 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2018-08-16-1: Fixes for: - DP full color range. - selftest for gem_object - forcewake on suspend - GPU reset This also include accumulated fixes from GVT: - Fix an error code in gvt_dma_map_page() (Dan) - Fix off by one error in intel_vgpu_write_fence()

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2018-08-06 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, Initial fixes for 4.19. Starting by the one where gvt compilation gets broken after a silent conflict between next and fixes. Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2018-08-06: - Fix gvt compilation broken on a silent conflict on fixes vs next merge - Fix runtime PM for LPE audio - Revert on

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-07-19 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, This is our final pull request for 4.19. I was waiting some gvt pull that I had nacked for lack of review, but that didn't came on time and it will have to wait for next-fixes or later. Here goes drm-intel-next-2018-07-19: On GEM side: - GuC related fixes (Chris, Michal) - GTT

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-07-13 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, This is probably the last pull request for 4.19 from our side. Please remind about the gvt-fixes vs gvt-next conflict that I mentioned yesterday on drm-intel-fixes pull request. Here goes drm-intel-next-2018-07-12: On GVT there's the addition of vGPU huge page support for guest, with

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next for 4.19

2018-07-10 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, This is probably the last big pull targeting 4.19. I will probably send another small one by the end of this week and if possible another smaller one by next one. Here goes drm-intel-next-2018-07-09: Higlights here goes to many PSR fixes and improvements; to the Ice lake work with

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-25 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, Here goes another pull request for 4.19. Highlights here to Ice Lake Display enabling, and to preparation for full-ppgtt enabling for older gens, and to hangcheck and gpu reset improvements in general. drm-intel-next-2018-06-20: Chris is doing many reworks that allow us to get

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 09:12:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Jani Nikula > wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On 12 June 2018 at 02:27, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > >>> Hi Dave, > >>> > >>> This is the first round targeting 4.19. > >>> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On 12 June 2018 at 02:27, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> This is the first round targeting 4.19. >>> >> Does this tree feed into linux-next already? >> >> Since we shouldn't have new stuff

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On 12 June 2018 at 02:27, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> This is the first round targeting 4.19. >>> >> Does this tree feed into linux-next already? >> >> Since we shouldn't have new stuff

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-12 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 12 June 2018 at 02:27, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> This is the first round targeting 4.19. >> > Does this tree feed into linux-next already? > > Since we shouldn't have new stuff for linux-next feeding into it until > after rc1. I think

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-11 Thread Dave Airlie
On 12 June 2018 at 02:27, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave, > > This is the first round targeting 4.19. > Does this tree feed into linux-next already? Since we shouldn't have new stuff for linux-next feeding into it until after rc1. I won't be pulling this until after rc1 anyways. Dave.

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2018-06-11 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Hi Dave, This is the first round targeting 4.19. Here goes drm-intel-next-2018-06-06: - Ice Lake's display enabling patches (Jose, Mahesh, Dhinakaran, Paulo, Manasi, Anusha, Arkadiusz) - Ice Lake's workarounds (Oscar and Yunwei) - Ice Lake interrupt registers fixes (Oscar) - Context switch

<    1   2   3   4   5   >