On 07/02/2023 08:49, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:59:36PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 06/02/2023 14:19, Dan Carpenter wrote:
[ Ancient code but the warning showed up again because the function was
renamed or something? - dan ]
Hello Chris Wilson,
The patch
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:59:36PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2023 14:19, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > [ Ancient code but the warning showed up again because the function was
> >renamed or something? - dan ]
> >
> > Hello Chris Wilson,
> >
> > The patch 871dfbd67d4e: "drm/i915:
On 06/02/2023 14:19, Dan Carpenter wrote:
[ Ancient code but the warning showed up again because the function was
renamed or something? - dan ]
Hello Chris Wilson,
The patch 871dfbd67d4e: "drm/i915: Allow compaction upto SWIOTLB max
segment size" from Oct 11, 2016, leads to the following
[ Ancient code but the warning showed up again because the function was
renamed or something? - dan ]
Hello Chris Wilson,
The patch 871dfbd67d4e: "drm/i915: Allow compaction upto SWIOTLB max
segment size" from Oct 11, 2016, leads to the following Smatch static
checker warning:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:14:56PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Chris Wilson,
>
> The patch 871dfbd67d4e: "drm/i915: Allow compaction upto SWIOTLB max
> segment size" from Oct 11, 2016, leads to the following static
> checker warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2357
Hello Chris Wilson,
The patch 871dfbd67d4e: "drm/i915: Allow compaction upto SWIOTLB max
segment size" from Oct 11, 2016, leads to the following static
checker warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2357 i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt()
error: we previously assumed 'sg' could be
