Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref

2024-04-19 Thread Jani Nikula
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, Imre Deak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure >> wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case >> and this function was totally unused until it

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref

2024-04-18 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:37:56PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure > wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case > and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again > by display with

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref

2024-04-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 01:30:21AM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:13:20PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure > > wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case > > and this function was

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Convert intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume towards raw wakeref

2024-04-18 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 06:13:20PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > In the past, the noresume function was used by the GEM code to ensure > wakelocks were held and bump its usage. This is no longer the case > and this function was totally unused until it started to be used again > by display with