On Wed, 17 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> Many thanks! Just to double check, do you want me to move patch 5
>> earlier and squash patches 6&7?
>
> Your choice. Either is fine by me.
I jumped at the easy option and merged this as-is. :)
Thanks again,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
Hi
Am 17.04.24 um 10:21 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 16.04.24 um 14:27 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 16.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Jani Nikula:
Repurpose drm_edid_are_equal() to be more helpful for its
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 16.04.24 um 14:27 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 16.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Jani Nikula:
Repurpose drm_edid_are_equal() to be more helpful for its single user,
and rename
Hi
Am 16.04.24 um 14:27 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 16.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Jani Nikula:
Repurpose drm_edid_are_equal() to be more helpful for its single user,
and rename drm_edid_eq(). Functionally deduce the length from the blob
size, not the
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 16.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> Repurpose drm_edid_are_equal() to be more helpful for its single user,
>> and rename drm_edid_eq(). Functionally deduce the length from the blob
>> size, not the blob data, making it more robust
Hi
Am 16.04.24 um 11:20 schrieb Jani Nikula:
Repurpose drm_edid_are_equal() to be more helpful for its single user,
and rename drm_edid_eq(). Functionally deduce the length from the blob
size, not the blob data, making it more robust against any errors.
Could be squashed into patch 6.
Best
