[Intel-gfx] Some questions.

2012-01-27 Thread Артём Алексюк
Hello. Sorry if I'm interrupting you with stupid questions :) I have a netbook with Atom N570 and GMA 3150. 1) I disabled KWin desktop effects for reducing power consumption. Is it a good solution or there is no difference if desktop effects are being switched on or switched off? How many extra

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] [CFT] interlaced support

2012-01-27 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Ok, so I had to look at the Windows registers again... Your interlaced branch had 6 patches. Patch 3 is the only one I changed. Here is my version: http://people.freedesktop.org/~pzanoni/0003-drm-i915-fixup-interlace-vertical-timings-confusion.patch. Now my monitor reports 1080i :) Some notes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] [CFT] interlaced support

2012-01-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:34:41AM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm interlaced Thank you Daniel, is it normal that is super-slow? git repors 1K/sec. I download about 10 MB so

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] [CFT] interlaced support

2012-01-27 Thread Alfonso Fiore
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:34:41AM +0100, Alfonso Fiore wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm interlaced Thank you Daniel, is it normal

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] [CFT] interlaced support

2012-01-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:25:49PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: Ok, so I had to look at the Windows registers again... Your interlaced branch had 6 patches. Patch 3 is the only one I changed. Here is my version:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: fixup interlaced vertical timings confusion

2012-01-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:11:30PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:03:02PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:01:30 +0100, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote: - /* XXX some encoders set the crtcinfo, others don't. - * Obviously we need

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] [CFT] interlaced support

2012-01-27 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:43:06PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:25:49PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: Ok, so I had to look at the Windows registers again... Your interlaced branch had 6 patches. Patch 3 is the only one I changed. Here is my version:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] [CFT] interlaced support

2012-01-27 Thread Alfonso Fiore
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: Paulo and me have crawled around in interlaced-land some more I just came home ready to test my compiled kernel but when I read this message I thought I should download your latest source files and recompile. It was not so