Hola Stuart et al!
First of all, thanks Stuart, for the headsup on this!
Could this be producing Rhodes gas (Brown stole it from Dr. Rhodes) as at;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/oxyhyd1.htm
The differecne according to PACE in Canada;
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/oxyhyd3.htm
Stuart Rae wrote:
Hi Jerry,
..snip...
Which is why I note with interest that a new "water based fuel"
invention has appeared on the block at:
http://www.biosmeanslife.com/index.html
In brief, the inventor is shown pouring a small quantity (about two
or three hundred ml) of ordinary tap water into a container about the
size of a standard car battery.
There appeared to be two wires coming from two opposite faces of the
container. The container's other faces were about half an inch
thick, with some circular objects at their tops, and they were orange
in colour. They also clearly have the words "HDD Cooler" printed on
the edges (number 8 wire?). The interviewer confirmed that the device
did not contain batteries and it was not plugged into a power source
of any sort.
No power source??? So its chemical or some 'flavoring' by an alloy or
combination thereof?
The inventor then connected the two wires together and it was left
untouched for something like forty minutes. While the interviewer
was allowed to observe the process in the container, the inventor did
not permit it to be filmed.. The water was then poured out of the
container into a glass beaker, and a sample of it given to the
interviewer for analysis. The rest was poured into a small tank
(about the size of a small thermos) mounted on a motor bike, where
the petrol tank would normally be. The original tank had been
removed, making the entire top engine structure and the fueling
procedure clear .
Did it show the production of bubbles or could you see inside the
container of water?
The bike was then started and filmed being ridden up to 50 mph on the
highway, and at lesser speed around a commercial courtyard.
According to the inventor, the carburettor had been only slightly
modified.
...snip...
(1) He will make so much money from this invention that he will
make Bill Gates look like a poor relation.
Uh-oh, not good if money is his only motive.
(2)That by applying for a patent (which is expensive, and
takes about a year) the confidentiality of his invention will
somehow be assured. And that with the granting of a patent
his intellectual property will be protected.
Someone should tell him about all the paid spies in the patent office?
As well about modifications of his design, use of newer materials or
techniques that make for a new patent and companies who would forge
ahead with copies realizing he doesn't have the money to sue them for
infringement. Many negative points about patents in my opinion. Ask Don
Lancaster!
(3) That the demonstration of his invention publicly, on
television, will somehow assure his personal protection against harm
from any commercial or other interest who may feel threatened by it.
(Alternatively, he has gone public in the mistaken hope that some
large commercial interest with a very big cheque book will buy him
out!)
Risking threats to him and his family or an actual sale where the
technology is locked away at the sole discretion of the buyer.
Tilleys idea to obviate that is to include a clause in the contract
REQUIRING the buyer to have the product on the market within a
reasonable time (2-5 years depending on complexity, etc.) or the
technology reverts BACK to the seller who keeps any money paid.
Those of us who have been around for a while know where all these
roads lead.
There is enough smoke that it makes sense to CYA (cover your ass) from
the gitgo (unfront) as much as you can. It always boggle my mind to
read of all the claimed inventions and discoveries which never make it
to market. This might be another one of them.
About the connection to Rhodes gas...years ago, Brown was all over the
Aussie news for driving a water fueled car all over Australia when
separated, the gases combusted and then which imploded to reform water.
Regards,
SR
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been transmitted using 100% recycled electrons
--
Jerry Decker - http://www.keelynet.com
Donations to support KeelyNet: http://www.keelynet.com/donate1.htm
Public Archive http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet
Order out of Chaos - From an Art to a Science
