The alternative is to put this code inside qmake itself, so no new binary
is created. This has the advantage that several Qt classes are already
bootstrapped, including the filesystem engine.
A bit late to the conversation, but wouldn't a nice first step / middle ground
be modifying qtsync
First of all, let me apologise for my behaviour in the thread on dependency
bloat. I've re-read my first reply and it was clearly out of line. And the
number of off-ML messages I got also indicates that.
So, my deepest apologies for letting my personal feelings and frustrations
with Windows
[mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Thiago Macieira
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:50 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: [Interest] Apologies on the bloat thread (a.k.a yes Windows is still
important)
First of all, let me apologise for my behaviour
hi,
On Apr 10, 2013 5:50 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
First of all, let me apologise for my behaviour in the thread on
dependency
bloat. I've re-read my first reply and it was clearly out of line. And
the
number of off-ML messages I got also indicates that.
same.
On quarta-feira, 10 de abril de 2013 23.03.53, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
Do you have a specification for what the perl script is required to do?
Use the source, Luke! ? :-)
Basically, it needs to scan all the *.h files in a given directory and
partially interpret the C++ class declarations in
=onshorecs@qt-project.org
[mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Thiago Macieira
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 5:37 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Apologies on the bloat thread (a.k.a yes Windows is
still important)
On quarta
On quarta-feira, 10 de abril de 2013 19.28.10, Justin Ferguson wrote:
that make sense on Windows must be implemented on Windows before they are
accepted. Any changes made anywhere must not break the build on Windows
please accept this criticism as earnest, heartfelt and with the best
+scott=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:31 PM
To: interest@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Apologies on the bloat thread (a.k.a yes Windows is
still important)
On Apr 10, 2013, at 8:37 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
(a.k.a yes Windows is
still important)
On Apr 10, 2013, at 8:37 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
Yes, there's a way. To tell you the truth, I was wondering if it could
be done in C++ with only the Standard Library. I've recently done that
(qtchooser) and it wasn't
On quarta-feira, 10 de abril de 2013 21.54.29, Michael Jackson wrote:
So we have to move include files around during the build because command
line lengths are too long? I have never understood why the header for
QString isn't QString.h. Why is it qstring.h?
The header is qstring.h because it
Hi,
1) the overwhelming majority of Windows downloads are of the pre-compiled
binaries and have been for as long as I can remember, so we will continue
to invest time to make that better, easier, more efficient
That's why we're now going to ship an MSVC2012 64-bit build, a non-ANGLE
11 matches
Mail list logo
