Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload

2008-01-01 Thread Johannes Schlüter
Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Johannes, I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always like ext/standard? First some statistics: According to my numbers[1], which are as wrong as most other statistics about such stuff. 1% (36

Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload

2008-01-01 Thread Pierre
On Jan 1, 2008 6:02 PM, Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Johannes, I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always like ext/standard? First some statistics: According to my

Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload

2008-01-01 Thread Richard Lynch
On Tue, January 1, 2008 11:02 am, Johannes Schlüter wrote: On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote: Hello Johannes, I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in always like ext/standard? -1 I still don't want SPL cluttering things up for me,

Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload

2008-01-01 Thread Mathieu Gagné
Pierre wrote: On a related note: Imo for users the real problems are different extensions, which we won't enable by default (due to their dependency on external stuff) and which might be available on some host or different php.ini settings. For instance I was once annoyed by zlib not being

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PATCH: Implementing closures in PHP

2008-01-01 Thread Ryusuke SEKIYAMA
Hi, Marcus. 2007/12/31, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Ryusuke, generally I like both. But could you provide separate patches? Yes, I can. Here is the anonymous function patch for PHP 5.3, http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080101-anon.patch the square bracket array syntax