Last year PHPUnit participated in the GSoC under the umbrella of PHP. Is
this possible this year as well?
I discussed this issue with Marcus and Chris DiBona at the mentor summit
and the consensus was that PHPUnit by itself is too small to participate
as a mentoring organization and that
Hi Sebasitian,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Sebastian Bergmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last year PHPUnit participated in the GSoC under the umbrella of PHP. Is
this possible this year as well?
I discussed this issue with Marcus and Chris DiBona at the mentor summit
and the
I have been working with different OO systems for a while and one thing
I really miss is an OMG specified package system.
According to OMG a package is a namespace however with the important
difference that you can make package accessible variables, classes and
methods.
The package access
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.03.2008, 01:24 +0100 schrieb Pierre Joye:
[...]
Maybe SOC:2008, using SOC as namespace and 200X for the main pages is better.
I like that. Is it possible to configure the namespace separator? I
would prefer /.
cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Lars Strojny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.03.2008, 01:24 +0100 schrieb Pierre Joye:
[...]
Maybe SOC:2008, using SOC as namespace and 200X for the main pages is
better.
I like that. Is it possible to configure the namespace
Pierre Joye schrieb:
PHPUnit already has a high visibility.
Huh? This is not about improving the visibility of PHPUnit.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B 6867 C514 B85B 5D69
--
PHP Internals -
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Sebastian Bergmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Joye schrieb:
PHPUnit already has a high visibility.
Huh? This is not about improving the visibility of PHPUnit.
I know but still.That's a side comment.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net |
On 06.03.2008 04:24, Joe Thomas wrote:
I would like to help maintain the documentation and possibly php.net.
I would also be looking forward to actually develop php runtime and
an official bundled php extension possibly in the near future.
Please start with patches, CVS account will follow
On 06.03.2008, at 09:26, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Lars Strojny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.03.2008, 01:24 +0100 schrieb Pierre Joye:
[...]
Maybe SOC:2008, using SOC as namespace and 200X for the main pages
is better.
I like that. Is it
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, David Coallier wrote:
I'm talking about extension developers. We will all have to add yet
another #ifdef for this function, in the implementation or to define
php_dirname to keep the implementation clean(er). As it is good to
clean up codes, I'm not sure
Hi all,
recently there were quite a few proposals about stuff for 5.3. If we implement
them all we won't finish in a soonish time and we get new ideas postponing
the 5.3 release therefore the following:
- Scanner based on re2c:
Going to re2c promises to make maintenance simpler and increase
Hello Gregory,
for include require we anyway use the streams stuff, don't we?
marcus
Wednesday, March 5, 2008, 9:24:39 PM, you wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
dmitryWed Mar 5 13:34:16 2008 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-src NEWS
Hello Johannes,
Thursday, March 6, 2008, 6:10:27 PM, you wrote:
Hi all,
recently there were quite a few proposals about stuff for 5.3. If we implement
them all we won't finish in a soonish time and we get new ideas postponing
the 5.3 release therefore the following:
- Scanner based on
Hi Gregory,
It's good idea. I missed this feature when I tried to transparently
include file from tar archive.
Probably we must do it.
Please try to make a patch if you have time (I'm busy now)
Thanks. Dmitry.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Beaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On 06.03.2008 20:10, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi all,
recently there were quite a few proposals about stuff for 5.3. If we
implement
them all we won't finish in a soonish time and we get new ideas postponing
the 5.3 release therefore the following:
I'd like to ask to re-consider
Hi!
One of the ideas [1] is to implement a parser for gcov data files in PHP
to integrate the code coverage information for PHP and PHP extensions
into PHPUnit's code coverage report. This could be helpful for
I think speaking of the coverage also there was an issue that phpunit's
Stanislav Malyshev schrieb:
I think speaking of the coverage also there was an issue that phpunit's
coverage calculating algorithm could be optimized, since there where
instances when generating coverage took too much. Is it still the same?
It is much better now, see
- bundling pecl/intl
According to Stas it's ready for being bundled and was voted in. The only
Most of it is ready, since 5.3 took more time that we initially thought
we also added dateformatter functionality there, which right now has
last wrinkles straightened out - code is mostly
Hi!
Also will be nice if zend.enable_gc ini setting is dropped as well
before it is too late , having yet another ini setting that alters the
engine behaviuor looks pretty much like the repeating the same old
mistakes over and over again.
Does it alter the engine behaviour? I was under
I think the real question we have to ask is Do we consider PHPUnit
standard for PHP Development Unit Testing ?
If so, PHPUnit gets a grant (or a chance to get one under the PHP
Project umbrella)
If not, then it doesn't.
I consider PHPUnit the standard for Unit Testing in PHP, now what do
you
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:20 PM, David Coallier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the real question we have to ask is Do we consider PHPUnit
standard for PHP Development Unit Testing ?
If so, PHPUnit gets a grant (or a chance to get one under the PHP
Project umbrella)
If not, then it
Hi All,
1) php internals (php-src, qa, docs etc)
2) any other php.net subproject
3) other php projects
if a proposal falls in 3) it needs to be really good and all the
prosals left in 1) and 2) need to be pretty unexciting in order to be
accepted.
And I fully agree.
By the way, I
On 06.03.2008, at 21:40, Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi All,
1) php internals (php-src, qa, docs etc)
2) any other php.net subproject
3) other php projects
if a proposal falls in 3) it needs to be really good and all the
prosals left in 1) and 2) need to be pretty unexciting in order to be
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Gregory,
for include require we anyway use the streams stuff, don't we?
include_path searching does not use php streams, because only the
plain_wrapper supports include_path (for obvious reasons)
Greg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Cristian Rodriguez wrote:
In all those cases, I expect a fatal error : cannot re-asign $this.
right ? or Im missing something ?
These examples don't cause any problems because they're not in the
object context, so $this is just another, ordinary variable. If you
include'd the files inside
-Original Message-
From: Antony Dovgal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 9:36 AM
To: Johannes Schlüter
Cc: PHP Internals List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3 Release Planning
I'd like to ask to re-consider dropping ze1_compatibility_mode and
finally drop it in
-Original Message-
From: Cristian Rodriguez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 10:03 AM
To: php-dev
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3 Release Planning
Also will be nice if zend.enable_gc ini setting is dropped as well
before it is too late , having yet another ini
Edward Z. Yang wrote:
These examples don't cause any problems because they're not in the
object context, so $this is just another, ordinary variable. If you
include'd the files inside something like:
The above is completely wrong, please disregard my ignorance. :-)
--
Edward Z. Yang
As promised a week ago, the 5.2.6RC2 was released today and the
sources for the release can be found here:
http://downloads.php.net/ilia/php-5.2.6RC2.tar.bz2 (md5sum:
d99362aad64dc630b8a684751a2c7302)
Windows binaries should become available in short order as well.
All in all the feedback
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi all,
recently there were quite a few proposals about stuff for 5.3. If we
implement
them all we won't finish in a soonish time and we get new ideas postponing
the 5.3 release therefore the following:
- Scanner based on re2c:
Going to re2c promises to
Hi,
I found some time to whip up a quick patch against 5.3.
This patch allows adding stream wrappers to include_path on both windows
and unix. This means one can set an include_path to
.:/usr/local/lib/php:phar:///path/to/ZF.phar/lib or the windows
equivalent
31 matches
Mail list logo
