I like the first too, if this can be implemented I think it is a
suitable syntax.
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 00:13 +0100, Alain Williams wrote:
public function int doThing(string $foo) { return 1; }
The above is the best (ie omit 'return' or 'returns').
This also is consistent with C and with
Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit function altogether when
using a return type hint?
public static function zomg() {
return $somethingArbitrary;
}
public static string foo() {
return $mustBeString;
}
otoh, should there ever be a type function (e.g. for anonymous
funcs) down
[My apologies if I am posting on the wrong group...please point me to
the right one]
I am trying to figure out a way to invoke PHP functions directly i.e.
bypassing the PHP compiler (scanner and parser). For now it would be
great if I can get some help calling them from C. Ultimately I would
Dhiru Pandey wrote:
I am trying to figure out a way to invoke PHP functions directly i.e.
bypassing the PHP compiler (scanner and parser). For now it would be
great if I can get some help calling them from C. Ultimately I would
like to call them from Java.
It's not difficult to call
Thanks for responding.
May be I mis-wrote.
What I would really like is a way to call the native c functions of the php
implementation directly (bypassing the PHP compiler) like:
PHP_FUNCTION(str_repeat)
PHP_FUNCTION(addcslashes) etc.
In other words I would like to invoke this functions
Dhiru Pandey wrote:
Thanks for responding.
May be I mis-wrote.
What I would really like is a way to call the native c functions of the
php implementation directly (bypassing the PHP compiler) like:
PHP_FUNCTION(str_repeat)
PHP_FUNCTION(addcslashes) etc.
In other words I would like to
Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Callback works with the native C functions too. It'll be pretty nasty
trying to get all of PHP's macros to work from scratch. Just use the
infrastructure that's in place already.
Sorry about the double-post; I should clarify: I mean that callback
works with PHP functions
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Dhiru Pandey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[My apologies if I am posting on the wrong group...please point me to the
right one]
I am trying to figure out a way to invoke PHP functions directly i.e.
bypassing the PHP compiler (scanner and parser). For now it would
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit function altogether when
using a return type hint?
public static function zomg() {
return $somethingArbitrary;
}
public static string foo() {
return $mustBeString;
}
i
Am 27.04.2008 um 00:24 schrieb Nathan Nobbe:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit function altogether
when
using a return type hint?
public static function zomg() {
return $somethingArbitrary;
}
public static
*cough* lambda *cough*
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:26 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 27.04.2008 um 00:24 schrieb Nathan Nobbe:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't the most consistent way be to omit function altogether when
using a
But anonymous functions and lambda expressions are not the same thing...
David
Am 27.04.2008 um 02:11 schrieb Chris Stockton:
*cough* lambda *cough*
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:26 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am 27.04.2008 um 00:24 schrieb Nathan Nobbe:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008
Anonymous functions as you know them today come from lambda calculus which
was created before computers were even made. Generally it is agreed anon
func == labmda can be used interchangeably.
Most developers will understand what:
public function lambda sowat () { return function OR lambda,
I'm getting persistent const qualifier warnings with MSVC 2005 Express,
along these lines:
..\extra\uriparser\uriparser.c(227) : warning C4090: 'function' :
different 'const' qualifiers
where line 227 looks like
add_next_index_stringl(path_array, walker-text.first,
walker-text.afterLast -
14 matches
Mail list logo
