On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The second release candidate of 5.2.7 was just released for testing and can be
downloaded here:
Could you please announce your plans for 5.2.7? I've some things to
merge but hadn't found the time yet to do so.
The Windows binaries should become
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The second release candidate of 5.2.7 was just released for testing and can
be
downloaded here:
Could you please announce your plans for 5.2.7? I've some things to
merge
But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
On 10/23/2008 23:40, Mark van der Velden wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I notice that 5.3 differs from 5.2 in how array_key_exists treats
objects. In 5.2, if the second parameter (array) is allowed to be
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ionut Gabriel Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
sounds like a good idea to me
On 10/23/2008 23:40, Mark van der Velden wrote:
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I notice that 5.3 differs
Hi Stas,
2008/10/23 Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
I notice that 5.3 differs from 5.2 in how array_key_exists treats
objects. In 5.2, if the second parameter (array) is allowed to be object
and HASH_OF is applied to it. However, in 5.3 it would produce a warning
requiring an
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
But I've heard in my computer class that goto can be dangerous and
should be avoided! :)
+1 for me.
Olivier
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Felipe Pena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
--
PHP
2008/10/24 Felipe Pena [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
+1 from me aswell, It doesn't looks like its maintained in php
anymore, nor does looks like its active developed anymore.
--
Regards,
Felipe
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
+1
--
Slan,
David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 24-Oct-08, at 3:47 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The second release candidate of 5.2.7 was just released for testing
and can be
downloaded here:
Could you please announce your plans for 5.2.7? I've some things to
merge but hadn't found the
+1
On 24-Oct-08, at 8:15 AM, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 14:37 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 24.10.2008, at 14:15, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
+1 (not wearing my RM hat .. so its not a final decision yet)
I can't image a single reason to keep it, did anybody, within the last
On 24.10.2008 16:15, Felipe Pena wrote:
Hi youngs,
What about moving mSQL to pecl? :)
Well, That isn't a task for me, ... just for remember!
http://news.php.net/php.internals/25296 =)
--
Wbr,
Antony Dovgal
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 13:15 +0400, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Ionut Gabriel Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But wouldn't be useful to at least accept objects implementing ArrayAccess?
sounds like a good idea to me
nope that would mean that some scripts might
Hello,
I have reported this bug http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=46354, because
new behaviour breaks my script. The question is how fix scripts for new
behaviour. Example:
// common array
$a = array('item' = NULL);
isset($a['item']) - FALSE
array_key_exists($a['item']) - TRUE
// ArrayObject
Hi!
nope that would mean that some scripts might work different between 5.2
and 5.3, now one gets an error. consider such a script:
Just so it is clear - some scripts ALREADY work differently, that's why
it says BC break.
?php
class Foo extends ArrayAccess {
public $prop = 42;
Hi!
In fact, all HASH_OF was removed in standard/array.c, and that's
already is mentioned implicitly though, as
The functions next()/current/… don't take objects anymore as
parameters. For accessing their properties using this way you have to
cast the objects to arrays first.
... is a very
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 10:05 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
nope that would mean that some scripts might work different between 5.2
and 5.3, now one gets an error. consider such a script:
Just so it is clear - some scripts ALREADY work differently, that's why
it says BC break.
Ryan Panning wrote:
I've been wondering, is such a thing even possible? Is there a good way
to implement an object destruct order? Here are my thoughts:
In the class definition, specify what level of destruction the objects
should be on. How, I have no idea, I haven't thought of a good
bogotify veeblefester twoway overestimated mathematically disagree powerhungry
hooked letterbomb
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
20 matches
Mail list logo
