On windows x86_64, PHP_INT_MAX is 2147483647. This is because in the
underlying c-code, a long is 32 bit.
However, linux on x86_64 uses a 64bit long so PHP_INT_MAX is going to be
9223372036854775807.
Kenan R Sulayman wrote:
Hi Lain!
As much as I did understand, this might be a pretty good
5.2 32bit situation at the moment
(int)(PHP_INT_MAX +1) (int)(PHP_INT_MAX +100) (int)(PHP_INT_MAX + 1000)
This does seem pretty sensible. I'm more worried about the 64bit case where:
(int)(PHP_INT_MAX +1) == (int)(PHP_INT_MAX +100) (int)(PHP_INT_MAX + 1000)
It would be nice for the 64 bit
Hi,
a bit down I wrote that the VS6 build runs. I took the snapshot from
2009-Feb-04 22:00:00
Tested the module and CLI. Both run fine, but the SQLite extension not.
Mario
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Richard Quadling [mailto:rquadl...@googlemail.com]
Gesendet: Do 05.02.2009 01:10
Hi,
Let me start by explaining what i am trying to do. I need to start a console
application and get it's pid. If i don't use bypass_shell, i end up with the
another pid (probably one for cmd.exe). If i use bypass_shell then the
application starts in the background, no window is shown. This would
2009/2/5 Alpár Török torokal...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Let me start by explaining what i am trying to do. I need to start a console
application and get it's pid. If i don't use bypass_shell, i end up with the
another pid (probably one for cmd.exe). If i use bypass_shell then the
application starts
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Terry Braun t...@talking.com wrote:
Hello,
I've written a small web server and I'd like to add support for php to the
server. Could anyone direct me to documentation or examples and give me some
sense of how hard this would be. Put another way, if I have a
Hello
2009/2/5 Terry Braun t...@talking.com:
Hello,
I've written a small web server and I'd like to add support for php to the
server. Could anyone direct me to documentation or examples and give me some
sense of how hard this would be. Put another way, if I have a working PHP
installation
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 13:12 +0100, David Zülke wrote:
Am 03.02.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47206 - XSLT
I looked through the CVS logs, could you confirm I understand it right:
The type hint was added in 5.2.6, and will be gone again in 5.2.9,
On 05.02.2009, at 17:32, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 13:12 +0100, David Zülke wrote:
Am 03.02.2009 um 14:41 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47206 - XSLT
I looked through the CVS logs, could you confirm I understand it
right:
The type hint
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:08 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
Currently theres no SAPI documentation, however like Alexey said it
would probably be easier to just the cgi/fastcgi protocol.
There's a chapter in Sara's book. sapi/embed is a quite simple example
of an SAPI. But I agree
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
- No typehint, as it is now, #47206 Expected / to be documented,
incompatible with 5.2.6-5.2.8 but compatible with most other 5.2
versions
Could we extend the arginfo system to allow for multiple typehints? Of
course the Reflection API would have to support this
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 10:36 -0800, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
- No typehint, as it is now, #47206 Expected / to be documented,
incompatible with 5.2.6-5.2.8 but compatible with most other 5.2
versions
Could we extend the arginfo system to allow for multiple
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Of course we could, we'd just have to change a structure and
zend_verify_arg_class_kind() and of course the language syntax to allow
something like function foo(A|B $bar) {} but this still would mean to
This should, of course, only be for built-in functions and
Would it be possible to implement CG(zend_linecol) in addition to
CG(zend_lineno)? As far I can see, this is a missing prerequisite for
Xdebug to report more fine-grained code coverage, for instance.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Would it be possible to implement CG(zend_linecol) in addition to
CG(zend_lineno)? As far I can see, this is a missing prerequisite for
Xdebug to report more fine-grained code coverage, for instance.
I've been thinking about this also, and would find this
Thanks to everyone for the help. One last hopefully quick and not too
naive question - can I just exec php and pipe input and output? There is
probably some good reason that is not obvious to me.
terry
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 17:08 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
It just sucks, IMHO, that some functions and methods will not have
Reflection API metadata because the same arginfo structure is used for
two things.
That did not come out right, nevermind.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
2009/2/5 Terry Braun t...@talking.com:
Thanks to everyone for the help. One last hopefully quick and not too naive
question - can I just exec php and pipe input and output? There is probably
some good reason that is not obvious to me.
terry
Some reasons would be:
* limited $_SERVER
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 14:59 -0500, Terry Braun wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the help. One last hopefully quick and not too
naive question - can I just exec php and pipe input and output? There is
probably some good reason that is not obvious to me.
terry
that's basically what CGI does,
Hi!
Would it be possible to implement CG(zend_linecol) in addition to
CG(zend_lineno)? As far I can see, this is a missing prerequisite for
Xdebug to report more fine-grained code coverage, for instance.
Unless we put this inside each opcode, I'm not sure it'd help xdebug too
much. And
Hi!
Of course we could, we'd just have to change a structure and
zend_verify_arg_class_kind() and of course the language syntax to allow
something like function foo(A|B $bar) {} but this still would mean to
Maybe just use a plain old if()? :) I understand that is super-uncool
bit we really
Hi!
naive question - can I just exec php and pipe input and output? There is
probably some good reason that is not obvious to me.
The good reasons for using FCGI are:
- environment passing
- headers handling
- POST passing
- stderr handling
- performance - creating new process is very
The first release candidate of 5.2.9 was just released for testing and
can be downloaded here:
http://downloads.php.net/ilia/php-5.2.9RC1.tar.bz2 (md5sum:
0252cc45cce713c10e2fae34aa9e406c)
The Windows binaries should become available shortly as well, for now
you can grab the win32
Hi,
just a suggestion, have you thought about using Quercus [http://www.caucho.com/resin-3.0/quercus/
]
or Project Zero [http://www.projectzero.org/download/]?
This projects are implementing PHP in Java.
Regards
Stefan
On 05 Feb 2009, at 16:12, Terry Braun wrote:
Hello,
I've written a
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky i...@prohost.org wrote:
The first release candidate of 5.2.9 was just released for testing and can
be downloaded here:
http://downloads.php.net/ilia/php-5.2.9RC1.tar.bz2 (md5sum:
0252cc45cce713c10e2fae34aa9e406c)
The Windows binaries should
Danke Mario, für den Hinweis !
Hi all,
Just for notice:
Windoozer7 has been compiled against the rules of VC9.
That means:
-VC9 is. going to run natively,
-VC6 Apps are embedded ( emulated ),
-therefore some kernel Apps have to be rewritten.
Thanks!
--
(c) Kenan Sulayman
Freelance Designer and
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
Windows binaries are now available in the usual place:
http://windows.php.net/qa/
Wouldn't by chance be able to add APC to that? It has been 13 months
since APC was built for Windows. (Never for a NTS version, as far as I
27 matches
Mail list logo
