On 16.08.2012, at 0:18, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk wrote:
How come there is no straight-foward obvious way to simply remove a given
value from an array?
Well, this sounds like a reason for creating SplSet class
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Laruence larue...@php.net wrote:
Hi:
This feature introduces list() support in foreach constructs(more
info can be found here: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreachlist).
please vote for this: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/foreachlist#vote
Hi Lauruence!
Is this
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Aaron Holmes aa...@aaronholmes.net wrote:
Thanks for clarifying. It makes sense now, considering foreach's behavior
and the generators statefulness allowing what otherwise seems inconsistent.
However, might it make sense to no-op instead of erroring? If
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals!
I think there already was a lot of discussion on the generators, so
it's time to move to the next step. I'd like to vote on the feature in
two weeks, so this the announce[ment] on internals@, by the author,
with the intention of voting
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
I've some comments how that I've read the RFC:
Recognition of generator functions
1. Any function which contains a yield statement is automatically a
generator function.
2. The initial implementation required that
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Sherif Ramadan theanomaly...@gmail.com wrote:
One question, though: It looks based on the voting like finally {} blocks
are going in. So... what should happen in the following situation:
function stuff() {
try {
foreach (range(1, 100) as $i) {
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Sherif Ramadan theanomaly...@gmail.com wrote:
One question, though: It looks based on the voting like finally {} blocks
are going in. So... what should happen in the following situation:
function stuff() {
try {
foreach (range(1, 100) as $i) {
Rasmus Schultz wrote:
I disagree - this is (or should be) a simple, atomic operation...
yet, you've got a function-call, an intermediary variable, a boolean
test, and an unset statement repeating the name of the array you're
deleting from.
This should be a simple statement or
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Nikita Popov wrote:
Hi internals!
I think there already was a lot of discussion on the generators, so
it's time to move to the next step. I'd like to vote on the feature in
two weeks, so this the announce[ment] on internals@, by the author,
with the intention of voting
On 08/18/2012 10:12 AM, les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Since this is yet another area where 'one does not have to use it if one
does not want to' ... FLAGGING to the other users that a function is a
'special one' rather than just a normal function with a generator function
seems to me just a
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 4:12 PM, les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Since this is yet another area where 'one does not have to use it if one
does not want to' ... FLAGGING to the other users that a function is a
'special one' rather than just a normal function with a generator function
seems to me
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Alexey Zakhlestin indey...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16.08.2012, at 0:18, Rasmus Schultz ras...@mindplay.dk wrote:
How come there is no straight-foward obvious way to simply remove a given
value from an array?
Well, this sounds like a reason for creating SplSet
( resending with correct formatting, and missing context while at it, sorry
about that )
On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Nikita Popov wrote:
(...)
Another aspect here is that there is no reasonable syntax for this
feature, at least I can't think of one:
* The syntax `$foo = (InterfaceName)
Nikita Popov wrote:
I don't understand this argument. Generator functions are transparent
to the user. You use a generator function just like you would use a
function that returns an array. From a user point of view it does not
matter whether getLinesFromFile() is just a function returning an
On 17/08/12 22:41, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 08/17/2012 05:35 PM, Rasmus Schultz wrote:
Most other languages have more than one collection-type... since PHP has
only the single, hybrid array-type which acts both as a hash and as an
array, something like this ought to be available.
I don't know
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short
On 18/08/12 14:52, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
Rasmus Schultz wrote:
I disagree - this is (or should be) a simple, atomic operation...
yet, you've got a function-call, an intermediary variable, a boolean
test, and an unset statement repeating the name of the array you're
deleting from.
This
On 2012-08-19 10:25, Andrew Faulds wrote:
On 18/08/12 14:52, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
How simple is it? Does it:
1) Remove one occurrence of the element (presumably the first) or all?
2) Reindex the array (as someone else argued was necessary to make it
properly indexed afterwards) or not?
3)
On 19/08/12 01:39, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
On 2012-08-19 10:25, Andrew Faulds wrote:
On 18/08/12 14:52, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
How simple is it? Does it:
1) Remove one occurrence of the element (presumably the first) or all?
2) Reindex the array (as someone else argued was necessary to make it
Hi!
For PHP we would need to have some similar behavior. PHP's current
exception model is incompatible with GeneratorExitException (because
PHP does not have BaseExceptions). So what I'd probably do instead is
monkeypatch a ZEND_RETURN opcode at the current execution position and
Patching
20 matches
Mail list logo
