On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Vartolomei Nicolae
nvartolo...@gmail.comwrote:
On Saturday, August 31, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
I already _have_ create files for functions of a namespace... Closed
source.
Can we take a look at them as an example? Maybe we can give you some
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
There has been a lot of discussion unto the merit of this feature. That's
fine.
What I'd really like to know before proposing this is what can be improved
in this RFC.
For example: someone (Stas) brought up
On 01.09.2013 03:01, Pierre Joye wrote:
Also I don't consider the separation userfriendly. A user comes to
php.net and tries to fetch downloads ... that might be streamlined quite
a bit when properly grouped together.
Many can, could, should or would. Complaining and doing almost nothing
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Krebs [mailto:krebs@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 9:02 PM
To: Stas Malyshev
Cc: Sara Golemon; Anthony Ferrara; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [DRAFT] [RFC] Function autoloading
2013/8/30 Stas Malyshev
Hi,
On Sep 1, 2013 11:24 AM, Florian Anderiasch m...@anderiasch.de wrote:
On 01.09.2013 03:01, Pierre Joye wrote:
Also I don't consider the separation userfriendly. A user comes to
php.net and tries to fetch downloads ... that might be streamlined
quite
a bit when properly grouped
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Let be more constructive.
We are discussing to make PHP better, aren't we?
Which perhaps why http://www.apachelounge.com/viewforum.php?f=6 has proven
popular. It would be interesting to know how many download from there rather
than the 'official' site?
Hi,
I ask this because the OpenSSL option here is the only CSPRNG; The others
are trivially breakable and should not be used for cryptographic
applications. I could see an argument for wanting to use them in
non-security contexts but I'm wondering if the API should make it clear
when that is
Lester Caine in php.internals (Sun, 01 Sep 2013 14:01:22 +0100):
Which perhaps why http://www.apachelounge.com/viewforum.php?f=6 has proven
popular. It would be interesting to know how many download from there rather
than the 'official' site?
I really would not know. It is a free
My previous message didn't push the point I wanted raise: don't we have a
major problem related to at-run-time namespace resolution for functions and
constants?
Take this code: namespace foo { strlen(bar); }
Will you trigger an autoload for foo\strlen?
I believe not because that would hurt
I can accept not supporting PSR directly but implementing the class
autoloader and stating internals believes autoload in should exist, just
doesn't specify/support any particular implementation, this makes sense,
although I like PSR and don't really see others that make (as much) sense.
This
Am 01.09.2013 15:12, schrieb Jakub Zelenka:
The whole proposal is a bit confusing for me. The combination of PRNG
algorithm (MT) with libraries (libc, OpenSSL, GMP) that implements one or
more PRNG algorithms just doesn't make sense to me. It doesn't say anything
about the speed and crypto
Nicolas,
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Nicolas Grekas
nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com wrote:
My previous message didn't push the point I wanted raise: don't we have a
major problem related to at-run-time namespace resolution for functions and
constants?
Take this code: namespace foo {
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Jakub Zelenka bu...@php.net wrote:
The whole proposal is a bit confusing for me. The combination of PRNG
algorithm (MT) with libraries (libc, OpenSSL, GMP) that implements one or
more PRNG algorithms just doesn't make sense to me. It doesn't say anything
about
Hi!
there has been some chatter about windows.php.net, which drives me to
the question: Do we need that site? Why and for what?
Since windows support in PHP is a bit different from Unix systems -
unlike all other systems, we provide official binaries - I think having
separate domain for it is
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
So I'd go for fixing what is broken and not fixing what isn't :)
Right, I am on it. Snaps page works now except for master. I will
finish that this week.
As of the announcements, yes, we really want to post windows
Matthew,
Yes, all of these problems can be solved - I am well aware of that. I am
also painfully aware of how much time it can take to solve them reliably.
I just would like to see a solution rather than a bunch of work-arounds -
not for my own sake, my problem is solved, but for the sake of
16 matches
Mail list logo
