On 03 Nov 2014, at 02:21, Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com wrote:
On 2 November 2014 15:10, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
Wait, what does session handling have to do with any of this?
Sorry, I completely failed to write what I was trying to say there.
I meant that like
Hi all
Resuming this once again after Anthony's blog post...
On 16/10/2014 18:10, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
I do agree that the default should probably be server-side since it is
the least surprising. We just need to make it
On 3 November 2014 09:18:08 GMT, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi all
Resuming this once again after Anthony's blog post...
On 16/10/2014 18:10, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com
wrote:
I do agree that the default should probably
On 03/11/2014 12:40, Rowan Collins wrote:
When using a one-shot call to query() with multiple statements (e.g.
create temp table; populate temp table; select results) it's actually
necessary with Postgres to switch on emulation, and for that
emulation to allow multiple queries even though the
On 03/11/2014 12:55, Matteo Beccati wrote:
[re: PQexec] Going from memory it is also used with
PGSQL_DISABLE_PREPARES (5.6+) if there are no bound parameters.
Actually, that was true only in the earlier versions of the feature.
I've decided not to do that to avoid behaviour changes and
2014-10-30 19:23 GMT+01:00 Sherif Ramadan theanomaly...@gmail.com:
Hello Internals,
I've been meaning to write up a full-blown RFC for introducing a new
standardized HTTP interface for PHP core for some time now. I figure now
with PHP 7 on the road map this might be a good time to start this
Hello!
There are at least three of the RFC for native work with annotations.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflection_doccomment_annotations
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations-in-docblock
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
I would like to know how plans in PHP 7 support annotations in the code?
Heya,
Its seems to me that more and more RFC are proposed to augment PHP's syntax
with some form of additional type hints.
The following RFC proposes to add a type hint for the return type of a
function/method:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehinting
It adds the type hint on the right hand
On 30 October 2014 11:31, Matteo Beccati p...@beccati.com wrote:
Hi,
On 30/10/2014 08:03, Trevor Suarez wrote:
Good early morning (late night for me) internals!
I would like to propose a small addition be made to the DateTime date
format constant definitions.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Chris Wright c...@daverandom.com wrote:
There are no current concrete plans and currently nothing being seriously
discussed (at least, not publicly; I don't know if anyone has anything in
pipeline that they haven't announced yet). The three RFCs you linked above
On 3 Nov 2014, at 15:07, Robert Stoll p...@tutteli.ch wrote:
It adds the type hint on the right hand side of the function (of the
identifier). In contrast to parameters where the
type hint is placed on the left hand side of the identifier.
Mixing both, having some types on the left and
On Nov 4, 2014 1:24 AM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Chris Wright c...@daverandom.com wrote:
There are no current concrete plans and currently nothing being
seriously
discussed (at least, not publicly; I don't know if anyone has anything
in
On 11/03/2014 05:26 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Nov 4, 2014 1:24 AM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Chris Wright c...@daverandom.com wrote:
There are no current concrete plans and currently nothing being
seriously
discussed (at least, not
On 11/3/14, 10:37 AM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
On 11/03/2014 05:26 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Nov 4, 2014 1:24 AM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Chris Wright c...@daverandom.com wrote:
There are no current concrete plans and currently nothing
Thoughts?
I think you didn't follow the mailing list or read the return types
RFC carefully if you think putting the return type before the function
name is good at all. Also, why are you starting this conversation now
instead of months ago or even a couple weeks ago when I asked for
feedback on
Hi!
PHP doesn’t need more inconsistency, sure, but we must be practical
here. It is bad if PHP and Hack have the same feature with different
syntax, it will cause developer confusion and further segment the
communities.
Given that Hack is a different language, which was designed AFAIK with
On 3 Nov 2014, at 19:28, Stas Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
PHP doesn’t need more inconsistency, sure, but we must be practical
here. It is bad if PHP and Hack have the same feature with different
syntax, it will cause developer confusion and further segment the
communities.
Hi!
This is an unfair comparison. Hack is a compatible superset of PHP,
much like TypeScript is a compatible superset of JavaScript.
So? PHP once borrowed Perl syntax, and Java syntax, and so on. Hack
borrowed PHP syntax, and that's great. But that doesn't mean what they
do in their own
On 3 Nov 2014, at 19:48, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
This is an unfair comparison. Hack is a compatible superset of PHP,
much like TypeScript is a compatible superset of JavaScript.
So? PHP once borrowed Perl syntax, and Java syntax, and so on. Hack
borrowed PHP
Hi!
Again, an unfair comparison. Hack isn’t intended to be a completely
I'm not sure what you refer to by fair. Hack is not intended, but IS
a separate language - just read the manual and you will see, it is a new
language which borrows some syntax from PHP. Just read their own site:
Hack is a
Hi,
This is based on an email conversation between Joe Watkins and me. I
asked him
what the original scope of phpdbg was, and I've summarized his reply
here:
- PHPDBG was originally envisioned as a gdb for the Zend VM, with gdb
like commands to debug, and step through code.
- Support for
Hi,
Why should phpdbg scope be limited, and not extended? As far as I know,
xdebug is nowhere like an official php project, so overlap shouldn't be an
issue.
I'm not saying phpdbg has to be extended, but I'm wondering why it should
be limited.
Regards,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Derick
Hi!
I'd like to put to vote my proposal about the filtered unserialize():
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/secure_unserialize
It was discussed a number of times before and I think it is time to have
a decision on it. If you need any clarifications on the proposal, please
do not hesitate to ask.
--
Am 03.11.2014 um 22:03 schrieb Derick Rethans der...@php.net:
Hi,
This is based on an email conversation between Joe Watkins and me. I
asked him
what the original scope of phpdbg was, and I've summarized his reply
here:
- PHPDBG was originally envisioned as a gdb for the Zend VM,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
I'd like to put to vote my proposal about the filtered unserialize():
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/secure_unserialize
Hi,
Coming late to the discussion. Was there any discussion to make the
new argument a callback
Hi!
Coming late to the discussion. Was there any discussion to make the
new argument a callback instead? Pass it the fully-qualified class
name, have it return true (the class should be loaded) or false (the
class should not be loaded). Deprecate the `unserialize_callback_func`
mechanism at
On 24 Oct 2014, at 00:36, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Here’s another RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties
After further though, I am withdrawing this RFC. It’s confusing and a
half-baked solution to the problem. Also, I’m not sure I like the idea of
variable visibility
On 3 Aug 2014, at 22:50, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Good evening,
I am proposing two new RFCs. As they are both inter-related and
complementary, with the second having the first as a prerequisite, I’m making
just a single email to cover both:
On 3 Nov 2014, at 21:33, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Coming late to the discussion. Was there any discussion to make the
new argument a callback instead? Pass it the fully-qualified class
name, have it return true (the class should be loaded) or false (the
class should not
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Larry Garfield la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
On 11/3/14, 10:37 AM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
On 11/03/2014 05:26 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Nov 4, 2014 1:24 AM, Jonah H. Harris jonah.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Chris Wright
Good evening list,
I'd like to open discussion a relatively simple and clear-cut RFC, either
people will like it or they won't, there isn't a lot more to say here than
what's in the RFC so please have a read.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/additional-splat-usage
Thanks, Chris
On 3 November 2014 22:45, Chris Wright daveran...@php.net wrote:
Good evening list,
I'd like to open discussion a relatively simple and clear-cut RFC, either
people will like it or they won't, there isn't a lot more to say here than
what's in the RFC so please have a read.
On 3 Nov 2014, at 22:45, Chris Wright daveran...@php.net wrote:
I'd like to open discussion a relatively simple and clear-cut RFC, either
people will like it or they won't, there isn't a lot more to say here than
what's in the RFC so please have a read.
Hi,
Derick wrote:
I asked him what the original scope of phpdbg was,...
And I very much agree that the above bullet points,
The original scope of a project and what it should be in the future
are not related always related. Please don't pretend that they're the
same thing.
Derick wrote:
I've
On 3 November 2014 21:10, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to put to vote my proposal about the filtered unserialize():
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/secure_unserialize
It was discussed a number of times before and I think it is time to have
a decision on it. If you need
Nothing magical in the annotations no, they very obvious.
It gives you the to declare logic and meta data.
I do not like annotated in comments, I like the implementation of
annotation in C#
2014-11-04 0:49 GMT+02:00 Levi Morrison le...@php.net:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Larry Garfield
Hi!
I wonder how often the final parameter will simply be
get_declared_classes()
That would be quite dangerous as there are a lot of classes in the
extensions, not all of them are your friends. Also, in a big projects,
you don't always know which classes may be currently loaded.
--
PHP
Hi!
- PHPDBG was originally envisioned as a gdb for the Zend VM, with gdb
like commands to debug, and step through code.
That was also my impression when the RFC was discussed.
Now, I do not object in principle on growing the scope of phpdbg. But
this needs to be done the right way if it's
Dear Internals,
I am pleased to announce that the return type RFC is now open for
voting[1]. Note that the implementation needs a bit of cleaning up
before merging should the RFC be accepted; Dmitry has already
volunteered to help with that, but more eyes are welcome.
A couple of things have
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Levi Morrison morrison.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Internals,
I am pleased to announce that the return type RFC is now open for
voting[1]. Note that the implementation needs a bit of cleaning up
before merging should the RFC be accepted; Dmitry has already
Hi,
I opened a pull request[1] in order to solve the bug 50224[2] and it ended
creating this pull request to add a new flag called
JSON_PRESERVE_FRACTIONAL_PART on json_encode function. This flag will make
the json encode to output float number always with decimal part, even when
it is 0.
On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 21:03 +, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hi,
This is based on an email conversation between Joe Watkins and me. I
asked him
what the original scope of phpdbg was, and I've summarized his reply
here:
- PHPDBG was originally envisioned as a gdb for the Zend VM, with gdb
On Nov 4, 2014 8:50 AM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
Whether the annotation is in a comment or not, the idea of changing
behavior at runtime based on the annotation is pretty magical. I
highly discourage using this type of feature whether it's in a comment
or not.
I will certainly
43 matches
Mail list logo
