Hi everyone
Sorry for the late reply.
I won't waste too many lines on usefulness as it is highly subjective.
The change will seem worth it to some people and not to others. IMO
language consistency is important and mainly what I'm striving for.
---
Hi Michał
> Can it be extended to non class
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 3:26 PM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class
> constants by name. We have dedicated syntax for basically all other
> language constructs. This RFC aims to get rid of this seemingly
> arbitrary limitation.
>
>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 10:49 AM Marco Pivetta wrote:
> What's convenient about `Foo::{$bar}` vs `constant(Foo::class . '::' .
> $bar)`? I'm a bit confused by this :|
>From the static analysis POV `Foo::{$bar}` is way better, as we can immediately
see that the code is trying to access a constant
Hi Ilija,
pt., 4 lis 2022, 15:26 użytkownik Ilija Tovilo
napisał:
> Hi everyone
>
> I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class
> constants by name. We have dedicated syntax for basically all other
> language constructs. This RFC aims to get rid of this seemingly
> arbitrary
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:08 PM someniatko wrote:
> > What's convenient about `Foo::{$bar}` vs `constant(Foo::class . '::' .
> > $bar)`? I'm a bit confused by this :|
> >
> > Is it the few keystrokes added?
>
> Even if ignoring syntax / convenience bikeshedding, I find it a really
> valuable
> What's convenient about `Foo::{$bar}` vs `constant(Foo::class . '::' .
> $bar)`? I'm a bit confused by this :|
>
> Is it the few keystrokes added?
Even if ignoring syntax / convenience bikeshedding, I find it a really
valuable addition to the language self-consistency. It's symmetrical
to the
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022, at 9:45 AM, Ralf Lang wrote:
> Hi Ilija,
>
> Am 04.11.2022 um 15:25 schrieb Ilija Tovilo:
>> Please let me know if you have any thoughts.
>>
>> Ilija
>
> That new way of accessing class constants dynamically does not really
> make things more readable for me. Maybe I just
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 15:40, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022, at 9:31 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > Heyo,
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 15:26, Ilija Tovilo
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone
> >>
> >> I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class
> >> constants by name.
Hi Ilija,
Am 04.11.2022 um 15:25 schrieb Ilija Tovilo:
Please let me know if you have any thoughts.
Ilija
That new way of accessing class constants dynamically does not really
make things more readable for me. Maybe I just need to get used to it,
but especially that last example would make
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022, at 9:31 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Heyo,
>
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 15:26, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class
>> constants by name. We have dedicated syntax for basically all other
>> language constructs.
Heyo,
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 15:26, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class
> constants by name. We have dedicated syntax for basically all other
> language constructs. This RFC aims to get rid of this seemingly
> arbitrary limitation.
Hi everyone
I'd like to propose a simple RFC to introduce looking up class
constants by name. We have dedicated syntax for basically all other
language constructs. This RFC aims to get rid of this seemingly
arbitrary limitation.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/dynamic_class_constant_fetch
Please let
12 matches
Mail list logo
