On 19/11/2014 21:39, Andrea Faulds wrote:
I am putting the Safe Casting Functions RFC to a vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/safe_cast#vote
Voting starts today (2014-11-19) and ends in 10 days’ time (2014-11-29).
Hi,
Judging from the discussions we've had with other members of AFUP, I'm
On 19 Nov 2014, at 20:39, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Good evening,
I am putting the Safe Casting Functions RFC to a vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/safe_cast#vote
Voting starts today (2014-11-19) and ends in 10 days’ time (2014-11-29).
Good evening again,
The final vote total
Stanislav Malyshev wrote on 27/11/2014 01:03:
Hi!
I don't know if it would make a difference here, but I wonder if it
would be sensible to add an abstain option in votes? That way,
someone who has considered an RFC but not formed a strong opinion
either way could register that fact. This could
On 19 Nov 2014, at 20:39, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
I am putting the Safe Casting Functions RFC to a vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/safe_cast#vote
Voting starts today (2014-11-19) and ends in 10 days’ time (2014-11-29).
So far only 15 people have voted, that’s very low for this
On 26 November 2014 20:42:26 GMT, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 19 Nov 2014, at 20:39, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
I am putting the Safe Casting Functions RFC to a vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/safe_cast#vote
Voting starts today (2014-11-19) and ends in 10 days’ time
On 26 Nov 2014, at 23:00, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
So far only 15 people have voted, that’s very low for this kind of RFC.
I’m tempted to extend voting for another week. It’s not likely to
change the outcome, but it would hopefully mean more people vote.
I don't
On Nov 26, 2014, at 17:24, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 26 Nov 2014, at 23:00, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
So far only 15 people have voted, that’s very low for this kind of RFC.
I’m tempted to extend voting for another week. It’s not likely to
change the outcome, but
Hi!
I don't know if it would make a difference here, but I wonder if it
would be sensible to add an abstain option in votes? That way,
someone who has considered an RFC but not formed a strong opinion
either way could register that fact. This could even be paired with
You could register that
Le Wed Nov 19 2014 at 10:57:39 PM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net a écrit :
- PHP suffers a lot from function bloat and this RFC provides
multiple functions that do the same thing but differ only in how they
handle errors. A simple validation of can this be safely cast to an
integer without
On 24 Nov 2014, at 16:08, Patrick ALLAERT patrickalla...@php.net wrote:
Le Wed Nov 19 2014 at 10:57:39 PM, Levi Morrison le...@php.net a écrit :
- PHP suffers a lot from function bloat and this RFC provides
multiple functions that do the same thing but differ only in how they
handle
On 21 Nov 2014, at 03:02, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
The problem is that it’s the least bad of the available options.
I disagree. To my mind, the best option right now (barring the status
quo, which realistically I'd prefer) would be the try_* functions
only. They line up with
On 21/11/14 02:10, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
To be honest, I have mixed feeling for this FRC.
Stricter type check is good. However, it requires runtime cost.
One of the area where it is being held up as good practice is filtering
data which is then passed to a database. With best practice on handling
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Good evening,
I am putting the Safe Casting Functions RFC to a vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/safe_cast#vote
Voting starts today (2014-11-19) and ends in 10 days’ time (2014-11-29).
Since some things might have changed since you last read the
My -1 is pretty much the same as Levi's:
On 19 November 2014 13:57, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
- The RFC does not address how this is different from
FILTER_VALIDATE_* from ext/filter. I know there was a mention of this
on the mailing list, but the RFC should say why a tool that
Not a voter, but I don't really see the usefulness of this in core either.
Sent from my iPhone
On 21 Nov 2014, at 11:45 am, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
My -1 is pretty much the same as Levi's:
On 19 November 2014 13:57, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
- The RFC does not
Not a voter, but I don't really see the usefulness of this in core either.
True. This could be on packagist or a php ext, but should not be in
core. Main problem is that it carries too much ambiguity between
validation and coercion while doesn't solve the real problem: strict
typing.
--
PHP
On 21 Nov 2014, at 00:45, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
My -1 is pretty much the same as Levi's:
On 19 November 2014 13:57, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
- The RFC does not address how this is different from
FILTER_VALIDATE_* from ext/filter. I know there was a mention of this
On 21 Nov 2014, at 01:48, Marcio Almada marcio.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Not a voter, but I don't really see the usefulness of this in core either.
True. This could be on packagist or a php ext, but should not be in
core. Main problem is that it carries too much ambiguity between
validation
Hi all,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Marcio Almada marcio.w...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not a voter, but I don't really see the usefulness of this in core
either.
True. This could be on packagist or a php ext, but should not be in
core. Main problem is that it carries too much ambiguity
On 20 November 2014 18:06, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 21 Nov 2014, at 00:45, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
On 19 November 2014 13:57, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
- The RFC does not address how this is different from
FILTER_VALIDATE_* from ext/filter. I know there was a
Hi Andrea,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Ideally, usage of these functions should be accompanied by some sort of
validation logic if necessary for the application. They aren’t validation
functions in themselves, they just prevent certain conversions that
Good evening,
I am putting the Safe Casting Functions RFC to a vote.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/safe_cast#vote
Voting starts today (2014-11-19) and ends in 10 days’ time (2014-11-29).
Since some things might have changed since you last read the RFC, I encourage
you to read through it again. If
On 19/11/14 20:39, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Since some things might have changed since you last read the RFC, I encourage
you to read through it again. If there are any questions which have not yet
been covered on the mailing list, feel free to ask them.
What happens on a 32bit machine?
--
On 19 Nov 2014, at 21:29, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 19/11/14 20:39, Andrea Faulds wrote:
Since some things might have changed since you last read the RFC, I
encourage you to read through it again. If there are any questions which
have not yet been covered on the mailing
Since some things might have changed since you last read the RFC, I encourage
you to read through it again. If there are any questions which have not yet
been covered on the mailing list, feel free to ask them.
- The RFC does not address how this is different from
FILTER_VALIDATE_* from
On 19 Nov 2014, at 21:57, Levi Morrison le...@php.net wrote:
Since some things might have changed since you last read the RFC, I
encourage you to read through it again. If there are any questions which
have not yet been covered on the mailing list, feel free to ask them.
- The RFC
26 matches
Mail list logo
