Le ven. 22 oct. 2021 à 15:41, Dylan K. Taylor a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:19:23 +0100 Claude Pache <
> claude.pa...@gmail.com> wrote
>
> >
> > Le 21 oct. 2021 à 01:12, Dylan K. Taylor a écrit :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Given the addition of Closure::fromCallable() and
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:19:23 +0100 Claude Pache
wrote
>
> Le 21 oct. 2021 à 01:12, Dylan K. Taylor a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given the addition of Closure::fromCallable() and the upcoming first-class
> callable syntax in 8.1, it seems slightly problematic that there's
> Le 21 oct. 2021 à 01:12, Dylan K. Taylor a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given the addition of Closure::fromCallable() and the upcoming first-class
> callable syntax in 8.1, it seems slightly problematic that there's no simple
> way to tell by reflection if a Closure refers to an anonymous
> On Oct 20, 2021, at 6:12 PM, Dylan K. Taylor wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Given the addition of Closure::fromCallable() and the upcoming first-class
> callable syntax in 8.1, it seems slightly problematic that there's no simple
> way to tell by reflection if a Closure refers to an anonymous
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 1:12 AM Dylan K. Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given the addition of Closure::fromCallable() and the upcoming first-class
> callable syntax in 8.1, it seems slightly problematic that there's no
> simple way to tell by reflection if a Closure refers to an anonymous
>
Hi all,
Given the addition of Closure::fromCallable() and the upcoming first-class
callable syntax in 8.1, it seems slightly problematic that there's no simple
way to tell by reflection if a Closure refers to an anonymous function or not.
ReflectionFunctionAbstract::isClosure() (perhaps
