Elizabeth M Smith wrote:
yes Hannes - interfaces for userland implemented streams would help
people trying to figure out if they have all the methods they need for a
particular stream type (SeekableStream et al) - this would be backward
compat (you wouldn't HAVE to implement the interfaces
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 23:01, Keisialkeis...@gmail.com wrote:
While dealing with the streams interfaces, what about making the api
saner, too?
All those bucket and brigade functions make streams unnecessarily complex
to deal with.
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.stream.php
I made an honest
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Andrei Zmievski and...@gravitonic.com wrote:
Taking advantage of php|tek bringing a lot of people together, we had a PHP
developers meeting over 2 days before the conference. Day 1 was dedicated to
technical issues in PHP 5 and 6, and day 2 was spent discussing
On 03.06.2009, at 22:52, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I don't want people here to assume that these notes are decisions
necessarily. They reflect the consensus of the group that was at the
meeting and we should still take up the unresolved or arguable
issues on this list. But hopefully we have
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth M Smith [mailto:auroraeosr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:43 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Notes from the PDM in Chicago
yes Hannes - interfaces for userland implemented streams would help
people trying
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth M Smith [mailto:auroraeosr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:43 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Notes from the PDM in Chicago
yes Hannes
2009/6/4 Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org:
On 03.06.2009, at 22:52, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I don't want people here to assume that these notes are decisions
necessarily. They reflect the consensus of the group that was at the meeting
and we should still take up the unresolved or
Hi Lukas.
On 04.06.2009 8:40 Uhr, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
To me its absolutely critical that we do not give the impression that
the next bigger update after 5.3 will be 5.4. The next big thing is 6.0.
Thumbs up, and good luck with this ambitious plan! ;) We'd be happy to
switch to PHP 6...
Greg Beaver wrote:
I think some people were volunteered based on prior contributions?
The first I heard of my role in phar for PHP 6 was reading it on the
wiki. Not that I have a problem with that, but I wonder if there are
other people who don't know their names are on the list?
Yes, we
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
To me its absolutely critical that we do not give the impression that
the next bigger update after 5.3 will be 5.4. The next big thing is 6.0.
If we do a 5.4 then it will come after 6.0, just like 4.4 to ease
migration. But it makes no sense to release 5.4 with forward
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:50 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Elizabeth M Smith; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Notes from the PDM in Chicago
Btw, this is also true for PDO. We would want interfaces
Taking advantage of php|tek bringing a lot of people together, we had a PHP developers
meeting over 2 days before the conference. Day 1 was dedicated to technical issues in PHP
5 and 6, and day 2 was spent discussing potential features, migration issues, current
roadblocks, etc.
People who
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 22:52, Andrei Zmievski and...@gravitonic.com wrote:
Taking advantage of php|tek bringing a lot of people together, we had a PHP
developers meeting over 2 days before the conference. Day 1 was dedicated to
technical issues in PHP 5 and 6, and day 2 was spent discussing
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I assume the names in parentheses are people who volunteered to do the
task, not whoever brought it up? (very ambitious crowd) :)
Volunteered to do it or at least guide others.
Regarding the stream interface, what does FIIK mean?
I would really love such an interface,
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I assume the names in parentheses are people who volunteered to do the
task, not whoever brought it up? (very ambitious crowd) :)
Volunteered to do it or at least guide others.
Regarding the stream interface, what does FIIK mean?
I would
Elizabeth M Smith wrote:
yes Hannes - interfaces for userland implemented streams would help
people trying to figure out if they have all the methods they need for a
particular stream type (SeekableStream et al) - this would be backward
compat (you wouldn't HAVE to implement the interfaces IIRC,
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I assume the names in parentheses are people who volunteered to do the
task, not whoever brought it up? (very ambitious crowd) :)
Volunteered to do it or at least guide others.
I think some people were volunteered based on prior contributions?
17 matches
Mail list logo
